On 2017-03-08, Dominik Psenner wrote:
> I am looking through the release and am going to give a few feedbacks
> during the next hour. The first thing i noticed is this:
> The website page 'features' still mentions that log4net has builds for
> ancient .net framework versions. We should change tha
Of course, this is just something I've noticed while clicking through
the site and it is definitely not a blocker for 2.0.8.
On 2017-03-09 09:13, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2017-03-08, Dominik Psenner wrote:
I am looking through the release and am going to give a few feedbacks
during the next
The votes are way too scattered over the different mailing lists so that
I didn't even find my own vote. ;-) Therefore I'm trying to summarize
the current state of the vote:
log4j-dev@, log4php-dev@, log4net-dev@, log4cxx-dev@ ->d...@logging.apache.org
Matt Sicker: +1
Ralph Goers: +1
Stefan Bo
You should note that while we consider all votes only PMC votes are “binding”.
I don’t think that changes much however.
From a PMC perspective I have to say that keeping the user’s lists separate
isn’t likely to be an issue as most of the things that would need to be
discussed would be on a dev
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15903339#comment-15903339
]
Stefan Bodewig commented on LOG4NET-556:
Thanks Steven, I guess I've gotten carri
Yeah, I agree that the user lists can remain separate as it doesn't cause
any issues currently. The main idea here is whether we should merge the dev
lists into one, or if we need a common dev list for all devs to subscribe
to (general@ doesn't sound appropriate, but I don't know what that list is
We use general as mainly an announcement list for topics that might be of
general interest to all logging projects. Generally, these are just release
announcements.
Ralph
> On Mar 9, 2017, at 10:37 AM, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
> Yeah, I agree that the user lists can remain separate as it doesn't
Guten Tag Ralph Goers,
am Donnerstag, 9. März 2017 um 19:24 schrieben Sie:
> We use general as mainly an announcement list for topics that might
> be of general interest to all logging projects. Generally, these are just
> release announcements.
And "general-dev@" is not an option because one ca
GitHub user yarick123 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/log4net/pull/44
make RollingFileAppender.RollOverTime(bool fileIsOpen) virtual to be â¦
â¦possible to extend functionality by sub-classing
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
+1
From: Dominik Psenner [mailto:dpsen...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2017 1:45 AM
To: Log4J Developers List ; Logging PMC
; Logging General ;
Log4Net Developers List ;
log4php-...@logging.apache.org; log4cxx-...@logging.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Combine the project user and dev m
10 matches
Mail list logo
