RE: Any plans for an MSI package?

2004-07-19 Thread Matthew Easlea
Title: Message   Personally, I support the apache group releasing an MSM (merge module) of log4net. I can’t think of any reason why I’d want to install log4net standalone (not for my needs anyway) so an MSM that can be merged into my installation packages would be excellent. Especially if

RE: Any plans for an MSI package?

2004-07-19 Thread Stricklen, Michael W
Title: Message Jiho is correct, an MSI needs to have a unique, but consistent GUID.  The only way I can see this being acceptable is if the Apache Group offered an MSI for the Log4Net package.  I’m not sure if the MSM is a similar situation as an MSM isn’t a standalone component (the MSM is

RE: Any plans for an MSI package?

2004-07-19 Thread Jiho Han
Title: Message Matthew,   I still haven't deployed log4net to the GAC.  And as another person pointed out, the .dll is already signed so installing into the GAC is not a problem. As you may already know, the issue is with a standardized way of installing to the GAC.  I am not all that famil

ADONETAPPENDER

2004-07-19 Thread gerald . dupres
Hello, I want to use the appender ADOnetappender to write messages in a sqlserver database. I use this appender configuration: