Log4Net Viewer is a GUI log viewer and filter for the Log4Net library. By
default it listens for LoggingEvent objects sent using the UdpAppender and
displays them in a table.
The events can be filtered based on:
Level
Logger
Message
All the details for each event can be displayed by selecting
Log4Net Viewer is a GUI log viewer and filter for the Log4Net library. By
default it listens for LoggingEvent objects sent using the UdpAppender and
displays them in a table.
The events can be filtered based on:
Level
Logger
Message
All the details for each event can be displayed by selecting
Pass the name of the System.Data.DbType enum value that you would pass
to the OracleParameter.DbType.OracleParameter.DbType for the prepared
statement parameter.
I don't use Oracle but I would guess that String or AnsiString and
Decimal are the values to use.
Nicko
> -Original Message-
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 16 February 2005 16:38
> To: log4net-user@logging.apache.org
> Subject: Default initialization of log4net
>
>
> Hi,
>
> recently i realized that there was some logging output via
> log4net in my app
Hi
I'm looking for a tool to view and filter log4net text output (I don't
wan't to filter the output itself through log4net configuration,
rather filter over an already generated log after a problem occurred).
I've seen this tool : http://www.codeproject.com/csharp/TraceTool.asp
but it doesn't se
Sorry that I forgot to mention that
I'm using ADONetAppender to log to Oracle 9i database. In log4net configuration
file, there is a ... block for each database
column, something like listed below.
Title: Computer name in parameter name of FileAppender
You should use curly brackets { }, not parenthesis (
)
Regards,
Dag
From: Nemegeer Marc
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17. februar 2005
17:16To: log4net-user@logging.apache.orgSubject: Computer
name in parameter name of FileAppe
Title: Computer name in parameter name of FileAppender
Hi,
According to the documentation the following section should work.
We're using log4net (the DLL version is 1.2.1.40796) in systems that
require 24x7 reliability and haven't had any problems at all with
either the RollingFileAppender or the TraceAppender on either single-
or multi-processor servers (Windows 2003). I've got no qualms about
using it in production, m
We have been using log4net in production since Summer 2002, and have
experienced no problems (even on SMP servers). We're using 1.2.0 beta 8
now. Appenders we use are RollingFileAppender and ConsoleAppender (with
PatternLayout).
Regards,
Dag Christensen
Vestfold Butikkdata AS
-Original Messa
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 11:19:18AM -, Steve Slatcher wrote:
> I am currently evaluating log4net for use in a new project. I am already
> familiar with log4j so feel pretty comforatble with the feature set. The
> only concern is that log4net is no longer being maintained, and that there
> a
Hi,
If I want to write logging to a CLOB
and NUMBER
columns, how should I define the parameters in the configuration file?
Specifically, what are the values in the following two lines?
Thank you in advance.
Ping Xie
CACI
4831 Walden Lane
Lanham, MD 20706
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(301) 306-8200 - M
Barry Burton wrote:
log4net-1.2.0-beta8
BTW- Don't let the "beta" tag fool you. It's been a
while since I used log4j, but isn't it classified as
beta also? I think this is just an attribute of open
source projects as they are never really finished;
someone is ALWAYS adding a new feature... :-)
Ho
log4net-1.2.0-beta8
BTW- Don't let the "beta" tag fool you. It's been a
while since I used log4j, but isn't it classified as
beta also? I think this is just an attribute of open
source projects as they are never really finished;
someone is ALWAYS adding a new feature... :-)
Barry
--- Steve Sla
Barry Burton wrote:
We have been using log4net for almost a year now
without any issues. Most of the problems you see are
the result of invalid configurations, not log4net
itself. I am just one voice, but I would have no
problem recommending log4net for production code.
Thanks Barry. May I ask w
Steve -
We have been using log4net for almost a year now
without any issues. Most of the problems you see are
the result of invalid configurations, not log4net
itself. I am just one voice, but I would have no
problem recommending log4net for production code.
Barry Burton
Senior Engineer
UAG
-
Hi guys
I am currently evaluating log4net for use in a new project. I am already
familiar with log4j so feel pretty comforatble with the feature set. The
only concern is that log4net is no longer being maintained, and that there
are only beta releases of 1.2.
Do you think log4net is OK for pr
17 matches
Mail list logo
