RE: Publisher policy not being recognized by Appender type reference?

2005-04-03 Thread Zimney, Christopher M.
Okay, so I noticed the problem after pasting this snippet in here... MISSING THE ASSEMBLY NAME from the fully qualified ref... :S Things are looking good! -Original Message- From: Zimney, Christopher M. Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 2:42 PM To: Log4NET User Subject: RE: Publisher policy

RE: Publisher policy not being recognized by Appender type reference?

2005-04-03 Thread Zimney, Christopher M.
Yes, in fact, it reports that the reference it's trying to address is a "partial" reference... === Pre-bind state information === LOG: DisplayName = Version=1.1.11.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=ff1099cf15ab5fb8 (Partial) LOG: Appbase = file:///C:/Personal/HostSolution/HostSolution/Sample.Web

RE: Missing LoggingEvents in RemotingAppender

2005-04-03 Thread Nicko Cadell
Sam, Thanks for the good repro case, nice to see someone using the tests! I created an issue to track this: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-21 I have fixed this in CVS and will look at what we can do about updating the release. Many Thanks, Nicko > -Original Message- > From:

Re: ADONetAppender losing logs

2005-04-03 Thread Kevin Williams
Nicko Cadell wrote: Kevin, Setting the BufferSize to any value less than or equal to 1 should have the same effect; to log synchronously. It didn't seem to be that way. It was 0 when it was logging sometimes at best. Once we set it to 1, it seemed to log responsively as would be expected. That ma

RE: Publisher policy not being recognized by Appender type reference?

2005-04-03 Thread Nicko Cadell
Do you get any binding errors in the log4net internal debug? http://logging.apache.org/log4net/release/faq.html#internalDebug Nicko > -Original Message- > From: Zimney, Christopher M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 02 April 2005 01:55 > To: log4net-user@logging.apache.org > Subject:

RE: ADONetAppender losing logs

2005-04-03 Thread Nicko Cadell
Kevin, Setting the BufferSize to any value less than or equal to 1 should have the same effect; to log synchronously. Previously you said "but the database is flaky at best. Sometimes it will work, sometimes it just won't log anything" later you seem to indicate that *nothing* at all is logged to