I'm not sure that it will. I thought debug builds also hook into the
ProfilerAPI, but I may be wrong about that.
As far as security, it's not anymore of a risk than deploying programs
based on scripting languages where the source is always present. And
with Reflector it's really easy to decompile
Hello!
Source code will be available from version 0.0.8 . In current version the
events can be filtered based on: Level,Logger,Message.
In your case you can enter "CompanyName.Product.Class" in Logger field to
see all messages belogns to "CompanyName.Product.Class" or
"CompanyName.Product.Class.S
Is there source code available for that Taras?
One of the many reasons I like Chainsaw is that it displays loggers in
a tree view so I can focus in a certain logger:
CompanyName.Product.Class
instead of seeing all the messages fly by at once. Is there any kind of
filtering in your program?
-
In this thread:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11140130966&r=1&w=2
on the log4j mailing list, Scott Deboy posted his Chainsaw:
http://logging.apache.org/log4j/docs/chainsaw.html
config file that he uses to query a Sql Server database every 3 seconds
for new log entries. It doesn't matter
You can check out Log4Net Viewer available at
http://devintelligence.com//log4netviewer .
Right now Log4Net Viewer supports only UDPAppender .
Regards
Taras
-Original Message-
From: Howard Weisberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 11:01 PM
To: Log4NET User
Subject:
How to add a custom level between FATAL and OFF?
What I want to do is to create a custom level (to log some statistics
information) that will output in all config except OFF. I could use
FATAL but this is just misleading since they are not FATAL errors.
Thanks
What kind of Log4Net viewers are available either thru the project or
from other sources?
Particularly useful would be a viewer that works with logs kept in SQL
Server. We'd like to avoid reinventing the wheel.
The information contained in this e-mail and any attached documents
may be privileged,
So if you include the pdb file on the server after the release build it will
provide line numbers? But would this not constitute a security risk with the
pdb file on the production server?
JJ
-Original Message-
From: Marc Lewandowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 22, 20
The RollingFileAppender currently does not support limiting the number of files
rolled by date. It is a feature we would like to implement in future.
At the moment to cleanup the old rolled files after a certain date you will
need to write a separate app or script which you schedule to run every
I think you are on the right track with the filter idea. You will need
to write a custom filter to look at the value of your userID parameter.
It could look something like this:
public class UserParamFilter : log4net.Filter.FilterSkeleton
{
private long m_userID;
public long UserID
{
ge
If you are making a significant number of calls to LogManager.GetLogger then
you may see some benefit from performing your own caching. The
LogManager.GetLogger call is not particularly optimised, it makes a few method
calls through interface pointers and looks up values from 3 different
hashta
Bill,
Long pattern names like %property require version 1.2.9. Can you retest this
using 1.2.9?
There are a number of permission restrictions that may prevent log4net from
finding the machine name, however that is unlikely to be the case.
If you are using 1.2.9 and you want to expose your own m
You need to use a LevelMatchFilter on your appender to restrict the
events to a single level. For example:
Nicko
> -Original Message-
> From: Shaily Goel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21 April 2005 06:13
> To: log4net-user@logging.apache.org
> Subject: Severity T
The RollingFileAppender only holds a lock on the file it is currently
writing to, not on the rolled files. If the files were locked it would
not be able to move them. The first thing to check is which process is
holding the lock on the file. The Process Explorer tool from
sysinternals (http://www.s
It should be very straight forward to build a proxy that will wrap any
interface and log all method calls and return values. While I can
certainly see this as a very useful sample of a way of using log4net I
am not too sure about it being a built-in component. I have built such
things in the past,
You've got it right. That is my experience as well.
-Marc
-Original Message-
From: Sam Smoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 8:44 PM
To: Log4NET User
Subject: Re: line numbers of exceptions no longer show
Don't line numbers only show in debug builds? Without t
Sanghamitra,
I could not find any text from you :-( Could you please send it again?
Thanks!
Or does anyone else have any ideas? Thanks in advance!
On 21.04.2005 22:07:12 Sanghamitra Chowdhury wrote:
>--- Kai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I just want to keep the logs from the last
Title: Nachricht
Thanks a lot for the information.
It served my purpose.I am able to log only "Info" messages by FileAppender
Thanks
Shaily
>>> "Helbig, Dirk (EXTERN: HUD)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 04/21/05 12:56 PM >>>
Here is a little example:
Don't line numbers only show in debug builds? Without the pdb the
original source, and line numbers, aren't present so they can't be
shown.
In a Release build these aren't present.
Or do I have it wrong?
On 4/21/05, Jeff Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> I am pulling my hair out try
I am pulling my hair out trying to figure out why the line
number of the exception are not showing up in production.
In my dev and QA environment it works fine.
Example: QA / DEV
Exception: System.Exception
Message: System.Exception: fun with exceptions
at Transcripts.log
20 matches
Mail list logo
