Re: Log4Net file locking

2005-11-23 Thread Mike Blake-Knox
y display it in the rich text box. Pointers any one-- Mike Blake-Knox

RollingFileAppender: log files with constant extension and composite name

2005-11-09 Thread Mike Blake-Knox
e a way to configure the RollingFileAppender to do this? I'm currently using the following configuration:                             Thanks.-- Mike Blake-Knox

Re: File Access Error with RollingFileAppender

2005-06-06 Thread Mike Blake-Knox
ed in a native environment and doesn't seem to be included in the .NET framework. This is unfortunate as I understand it was originally intended to improve Unix compatibility. I suppose that the bottom line is that the file "appender locking models" improvement helps but doesn't eliminate the problem. -- Mike Blake-Knox

OT - xml version 1.1 and XmlTextWrite/XmlTextReader

2005-04-11 Thread Mike Blake-Knox
to use XML Version 1.1? My work around was to use XML 1.0 with an ad-hoc mechanism to escape control characters. -- Mike Blake-Knox

Re: chainsaw and "escaping" XML entities

2005-04-11 Thread Mike Blake-Knox
de, I don't see that the transport of binary data is a key purpose for log4net. Much as I dislike option proliferation, I wonder if would it be reasonable to have 3 as an optional behavior but 1 or 2 as a default? What does log4j do in this situation? -- Mike Blake-Knox

Re: chainsaw and "escaping" XML entities

2005-03-24 Thread Mike Blake-Knox
hainsaw to do with your control > characters? If we just stripped them out would that be ok? Or could we > replace them with spaces? > > Nicko > > > -Original Message- > > From: Mike Blake-Knox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 23 March 2005 14:03 > &g

Re: chainsaw and "escaping" XML entities

2005-03-23 Thread Mike Blake-Knox
I changed the xml version to 1.1. Unfortunately, messages "XML version "1.0" is recognized, but not "1.1"" are displayed when it tries to parse it. (In some perverse way, that's an improvement in that you get the message on the display for each received log; using xml 1.0, it just dropped the mess

Re: chainsaw and "escaping" XML entities

2005-03-22 Thread Mike Blake-Knox
? > > I will have a look and see if it is possible to control the behaviour of > the XmlTextWriter with respect to the target XML version. > > Nicko > > > -Original Message- > > From: Mike Blake-Knox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 21 March 2005

Fwd: chainsaw and "escaping" XML entities

2005-03-21 Thread Mike Blake-Knox
ed message ------ From: Mike Blake-Knox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 08:54:38 -0500 Subject: chainsaw and "escaping" XML entities To: Log4J Users List I'm using log4net to generate log files that I'm reading with chainsaw. Some of the "text" of a log mess

Re: log4net, UDPAppender and Chainsaw v2

2005-02-14 Thread Mike Blake-Knox
--- Chris Restall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Provided I keep the remoteAddress set to the loopback "127.0.0.1", I > can > view the logging information via Chainsaw on my local machine. When > I > configure the UdpAppender on another machine on the same local > network > (no firewalls up) to po

Re: Another exception in RollingFileAppender

2005-02-08 Thread Mike Blake-Knox
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 22:18:41 -, Nicko Cadell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have run a little perf test. > > When parsing valid data the TryParse method is 50% slower than > int.Parse. This difference is expected, it may even be rather less than > anticipated. > When parsing invalid data the in

Re: Another exception in RollingFileAppender

2005-02-07 Thread Mike Blake-Knox
pes in .NET 2.0, > however that is not a workable solution for us at the moment. Understand. Error handling is always at least a bit of a challenge. -- Mike Blake-Knox

Another exception in RollingFileAppender

2005-02-07 Thread Mike Blake-Knox
27;s too critical. -- Mike Blake-Knox

RollingFileAppender Exception

2005-02-02 Thread Mike Blake-Knox
'm using the following configuration: -- Mike Blake-Knox

RE: Viewing log4net XML documentation

2004-12-18 Thread Mike Blake-Knox
Sure enough, it was exactly where you said it should be. Can I suggest that you put a link to it in the main document (index.html) please? (Amazingly enough, the build file seems to currently have the only reference to the compiled help). Thanks. Mike Blake-Knox email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TSYS

RE: Viewing log4net XML documentation

2004-12-18 Thread Mike Blake-Knox
Sure enough, it was exactly where you said it should be. Can I suggest that you put a link to it in the main document (index.html) please? (Amazingly enough, the build file seems to currently have the only reference to the compiled help). Thanks. Mike Blake-Knox email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TSYS

RE: Viewing log4net XML documentation

2004-12-18 Thread Mike Blake-Knox
Sure enough, it was exactly where you said it should be. Can I suggest that you put a link to it in the main document (index.html) please? (Amazingly enough, the build file seems to currently have the only reference to the compiled help). Thanks. Mike Blake-Knox email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TSYS

RE: Viewing log4net XML documentation

2004-12-18 Thread Mike Blake-Knox
Sure enough, it was exactly where you said it should be. Can I suggest that you put a link to it in the main document (index.html) please? (Amazingly enough, the build file seems to currently have the only reference to the compiled help). Thanks. Mike Blake-Knox email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TSYS

RE: Viewing log4net XML documentation

2004-12-18 Thread Mike Blake-Knox
Sure enough, it was exactly where you said it should be. Can I suggest that you put a link to it in the main document (index.html) please? (Amazingly enough, the build file seems to currently have the only reference to the compiled help). Thanks. Mike Blake-Knox email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TSYS

RE: Viewing log4net XML documentation

2004-12-18 Thread Mike Blake-Knox
Sure enough, it was exactly where you said it should be. Can I suggest that you put a link to it in the main document (index.html) please? (Amazingly enough, the build file seems to currently have the only reference to the compiled help). Thanks. Mike Blake-Knox email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TSYS

RE: Viewing log4net XML documentation

2004-12-18 Thread Mike Blake-Knox
Sure enough, it was exactly where you said it should be. Can I suggest that you put a link to it in the main document (index.html) please? (Amazingly enough, the build file seems to currently have the only reference to the compiled help). Thanks. Mike Blake-Knox email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TSYS

RE: Viewing log4net XML documentation

2004-12-18 Thread Mike Blake-Knox
Sure enough, it was exactly where you said it should be. Can I suggest that you put a link to it in the main document (index.html) please? (Amazingly enough, the build file seems to currently have the only reference to the compiled help). Thanks. Mike Blake-Knox email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TSYS

RE: Using Socketappender vs SMB share

2004-12-05 Thread Mike Blake-Knox
FILE_SHARE_DELETE will prevent this. Mike Blake-Knox email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TSYS Office: (706) 644-3643 cellphone: (706) 570-4641 > -Original Message- > From: Randy Xu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 11:46 AM > To: Log4NET User > Subject: Using So

RoolingFileAppender constant file extensions

2004-11-26 Thread Mike Blake-Knox
t the generated file name's extension are constant (e.g., .log) and the date/sequence fields are before the final "."? Thanks Mike Blake-Knox Voice: (706) 561-7491 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Can I write my own appender

2004-10-13 Thread Mike Blake-Knox
Title: Message Have you considered using the UdpAppender?   Mike Blake-Knox email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TSYS Office: (706) 644-3643 cellphone: (706) 570-4641   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 9:00 AMTo: log4net-user

RE: Watching logs

2004-09-28 Thread Mike Blake-Knox
uration is: http://jakarta.apache.org/log4j/"; debug="true"> Mike Blake-Knox email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TSYS Office: (706) 644-3643 cellphone: (706)

RE: Log4net and chainsaw

2004-09-16 Thread Mike Blake-Knox
is is still required. The build of Chainsaw isn't error free (there are about 37 Javadoc warnings) and there is an exception to do with VFS. I'm using it with an old build of log4net so YMMV. Mike Blake-Knox email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TSYS Office: (706) 644-3643 cellphone: (706) 570-4641

XmlLayoutSchemaLog4j and hostname

2004-08-23 Thread Mike Blake-Knox
perties["log4jmachinename"] = SystemInfo.HostName; } Mike Blake-Knox email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TSYS Office: (706) 644-3643 cellphone: (706) 570-4641

RE: XmlLayoutSchemaLog4j timestamp

2004-08-20 Thread Mike Blake-Knox
e you the number of seconds since the epoch (January 1, 1970 0:00:00 UTC). Regards, Mike Blake-Knox email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TSYS Office: (706) 644-3643 cellphone: (706) 570-4641 > -Original Message- > From: Nicko Cadell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 19

RE: XmlLayoutSchemaLog4j timestamp

2004-08-19 Thread Mike Blake-Knox
had great difficulty extracting sensible times from Samba and SMB shares. Regards, Mike Blake-Knox email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TSYS Office: (706) 644-3643 cellphone: (706) 570-4641 > -Original Message- > From: Nicko Cadell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 19, 20

XmlLayoutSchemaLog4j timestamp

2004-08-17 Thread Mike Blake-Knox
t;). Mike Blake-Knox email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TSYS Office: (706) 644-3643 cellphone: (706) 570-4641