-- rich --
[ ] Yes
[X] No, no need
Unnecessary for my needs. Glad you asked though!
-- rich --
Richard J. Pennenga
Software Developer
Angel Medical Systems, Inc.
T: 732-542-5551 x110
F: 732-542-5560
rpenne...@angel-med.com
www.angel-med.com
-Original Message-
From: D
I'm interested in the answer. I use ; I lack the imbedded date, but it
does the right thing on restart. I recall starting with a setup like that
below (), and recall seeing this same behavior,
and finally being told that it was a limitation of the implementation. True?
rich
What is the "hard problem" in your application, where your intuition tells you
Log4net is going to be helpful? How can we help you?
Richard J. Pennenga
Software Developer
Angel Medical Systems, Inc.
T: 732-542-5551 x110
F: 732-542-5560
rpenne...@angel-med.com
www.angel-med.com [cid:image001
If you create a new logger for each thread (saving the ILog reference in
thread-local storage), you can define whatever appender you want for it. I
would think that would eliminate thread safety issues.
Richard J. Pennenga
Software Developer
Angel Medical Systems, Inc.
T: 732-542-5551 x110
F:
David,
You could loop through all the Appenders, looking for the one with your
specific name, and then change the appropriate property at runtime.
I found really useful code for looping through & finding Appenders from Andrew
Andrew Elmhorst and Nicko Cadell, posted here:
http://www.l4ndash.c
Stefan,
Congratulations and thanks!
Richard J. Pennenga
Software Developer
Angel Medical Systems, Inc.
T: 732-542-5551 x110
F: 732-542-5560
rpenne...@angel-med.com
www.angel-med.com
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 20
As long as support for .NET 1.1 is preserved... ok by me.
Richard J. Pennenga
Software Developer
Angel Medical Systems, Inc.
T: 732-542-5551 x110
F: 732-542-5560
rpenne...@angel-med.com
www.angel-med.com
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesd
