14 April 2005 16:41
> To: Log4NET User
> Subject: Re: RollingFileAppender Problems using Multiple App Instances
>
> Hi,
>
> The %processid approach seems like a nice way at first, but
> this would cause an explosion of logfiles.
>
> My solution is to append an extra P
test version of log4net from CVS
which supports using a patterned string to add the process id to the
file name as follows:
Nicko
-Original Message-
From: Nick Jagger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 March 2005 10:53
To: log4net-user@logging.apache.org
Subject: RollingFileAppender
n't a problem. Thanks anyway...
-Original Message-
From: Nicko Cadell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 March 2005 21:02
To: Log4NET User
Subject: RE: RollingFileAppender Problems using Multiple App Instances
The FileAppender (and RollingFileAppender) takes an exclusive lock on
the o
the process id to the
file name as follows:
Nicko
> -Original Message-
> From: Nick Jagger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 03 March 2005 10:53
> To: log4net-user@logging.apache.org
> Subject: RollingFileAppender Problems using Multiple App Instances
>
> Hi,
>
Hi,
I'm having problems trying to log to a log file using multiple instances of an
.exe. I've seen this problem on the forum a few times but unfortunately can't
seem to find any satisfactory answers.
Some solutions point to using a RemotingAppender but unfortunately a) I'm
having trouble findi
