On 6 January 2013 19:50, Palmer, Eric wrote:
> LoggerAppenderAwsSQS
> LoggerAppenderAwsSNS
> LoggerAppenderAwsSimpleDB
>
> What is your preference
I'd prefer the second variation - the one with capitalised SQS and
SNS. Looks better to me.
Currently, the component naming is not very well defined.
I like the addon approach.
To set up a amazon web services account you need a credit card for the account.
You then can set up user with just the privileges that are needed. That way
the user's privileges can be revoked at any time and you don't expose any more
access to the account than neede
For the Amazon Web Services Appenders I'm suggesting names that look this way:
LoggerAppenderAwsService
so
LoggerAppenderAwsSqs - simple queing service
LoggerAppenderAwsSns - simple notification service
LoggerAppenderAwsSimpleDB - simple DB
or they can be
LoggerAppenderAwsSQS
LoggerAppenderAw
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Palmer, Eric wrote:
> You would have to have an account with a que name, db name and topic name to
> test it. In reality these are ARN like URLs. The cost is minimal. You can
> send like 100,000 SQS messages for pennies.
>
> But there is no easy way to fake it
Hello,
I have managed to get log4php set up on my centos 6.x 64 bit system. I did not
yet install mongodb or sqlite. But everything else appears to be set up
properly.
I followed the directions here
http://wiki.apache.org/logging-log4php/SettingUpALinuxEnvironment except I
adapted to centos
