Re: PHP minimum req for 3.x (was: Re: LOG4PHP-211)

2015-02-25 Thread Sven Rautenberg
Drop support for 5.3? Yes. Absolutely. It's unmaintained. Jump to bleeding edge 5.6? I don't like it because I use 5.5. And I think 5.4 still gets bug fixes, doesn't it? Making the currently maintained PHP version the minimum requirement sounds like a good guideline. On 25. Februar 2015 10:00:

Re: PHP minimum req for 3.x

2015-02-25 Thread Michel Feldheim
as a base for this discussion: overview over language-specific features introduces since PHP 5.3 PHP 5.3 - namespaces - late static binding (static::) - goto (yay) - closures - nowdocs - const outside of classes - terniary operator shorthand ?: - nested exceptions PHP 5.4 - traits - sh

PHP minimum req for 3.x (was: Re: LOG4PHP-211)

2015-02-25 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Actually the question is, if we should go with PHP 5.3 or just take the fancy features of 5.6. Some might argue "we don't need all features necessarily". Thats often an argument in Java land, and people stick with Java 5 or 6 in some frameworks because it can be done without. I think good and fan

Re: LOG4PHP-211

2015-02-25 Thread Michel Feldheim
Thanks guys for clarifying. Agree, PSR-4 autoloading would be another improvement. Introducing Namespaces increases the PHP requirement from currently >=5.2.7 (according to the composer.json) to >=5.3.0 On 02/24/2015 07:34 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: Hey all, On Tue, Feb 24, 2015, at 19:22