Re: [VOTE] Combine the project user and dev mailing lists into user@ and dev@

2017-03-09 Thread Dominik Psenner
The votes are way too scattered over the different mailing lists so that I didn't even find my own vote. ;-) Therefore I'm trying to summarize the current state of the vote: log4j-dev@, log4php-dev@, log4net-dev@, log4cxx-dev@ ->d...@logging.apache.org Matt Sicker: +1 Ralph Goers: +1 Stefan Bo

[Discuss][VOTE] Combine the project user and dev mailing lists into user@ and dev@

2017-03-09 Thread Ralph Goers
You should note that while we consider all votes only PMC votes are “binding”. I don’t think that changes much however. From a PMC perspective I have to say that keeping the user’s lists separate isn’t likely to be an issue as most of the things that would need to be discussed would be on a dev

Re: [Discuss][VOTE] Combine the project user and dev mailing lists into user@ and dev@

2017-03-09 Thread Matt Sicker
Yeah, I agree that the user lists can remain separate as it doesn't cause any issues currently. The main idea here is whether we should merge the dev lists into one, or if we need a common dev list for all devs to subscribe to (general@ doesn't sound appropriate, but I don't know what that list is

Re: [Discuss][VOTE] Combine the project user and dev mailing lists into user@ and dev@

2017-03-09 Thread Ralph Goers
We use general as mainly an announcement list for topics that might be of general interest to all logging projects. Generally, these are just release announcements. Ralph > On Mar 9, 2017, at 10:37 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > Yeah, I agree that the user lists can remain separate as it doesn't

Re: [Discuss][VOTE] Combine the project user and dev mailing lists into user@ and dev@

2017-03-09 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Ralph Goers, am Donnerstag, 9. März 2017 um 19:24 schrieben Sie: > We use general as mainly an announcement list for topics that might > be of general interest to all logging projects. Generally, these are just > release announcements. And "general-dev@" is not an option because one ca