Hi all,
>> I agree with Michael.
>>
>> Even 1&1 and some other hoster does not provide 5.3 support
>> yet. Of course, testing is not really necessary for production
>> environment... but who knows what people out there are doing?
>>
>> And really I *wished* it would be
On 6 September 2011 10:55, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Speaking on namespaces... one thing comes to my mind.
> Should we put log4php 2.x to maintenance only mode and create a
> log4php 3.x version supporting php 5.3 + namespaces?
I definately think we should do this, but not right now.
There is
> This means that people testing on PHP 5.2
> will have some skipped tests. Testing will NOT fail on 5.2. Currently,
> they will also have skipped tests if they don't have pdo_sqlite3 or
> mongodb extensions loaded (and a mongodb server up and running).
Well, I could live with that actually. Didn
On 6 September 2011 10:14, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> I agree with Michael.
>
> Even 1&1 and some other hoster does not provide 5.3 support yet. Of
> course, testing is not really necessary for production environment...
> but who knows what people out there are doing?
>
> And really I *wished* i
would be different - I think at namespaces.
Cheers
>
>
>
> BR
>
> Michael.
>
>
>
> From: Ivan Habunek [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2011 23:12
> To: Log4PHP Dev
> Subject: PHP 5.3 required
>
>
>
> Hi one and al
just for supporting unit tests of
Log4PHP at this time.
BR
Michael.
From: Ivan Habunek [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2011 23:12
To: Log4PHP Dev
Subject: PHP 5.3 required
Hi one and all,
Just finished rewriting Syslog appender. While writing tests, I used
reflectio
Hi one and all,
Just finished rewriting Syslog appender. While writing tests, I used
reflections to make private methods an properties public. This makes testing
much easier and more efficient.
However, some of the reflection methods used require PHP 5.3 2 or later. For
example, a vital one is:
h
