Re: log4php naming convention

2007-07-13 Thread Knut Urdalen
Ok, the naming convention will be kept for minimal BC breaks. It has not been any good reason to change the names. Knut

Re: log4php naming convention

2007-06-18 Thread t . sittig
Hello guys, first of all, i think it's great that there are, after some months (or years? ;)), be a bunch of guys, that will work again on this project. I'm using log4php since year or so, fix some bugs from the latest trunk and adding the one or other appender for some projects. I ask marco l

Re: log4php naming convention

2007-06-15 Thread Alvaro Carrasco
Knut Urdalen wrote: This topic has been discussed before [1]. But I want to highlight it again since I'm working with the initial functional version of the PHP 5 port and IF we should do any changes to how log4php classes are named, this is the time to do it. As I see it we have two reasonable

Re: log4php naming convention

2007-06-15 Thread Michael Schmitz
> "Knut" == Knut Urdalen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Knut> This topic has been discussed before [1]. But I want to Knut> highlight it again since I'm working with the initial Knut> functional version of the PHP 5 port and IF we should do any Knut> changes to how log4php classe

log4php naming convention

2007-06-14 Thread Knut Urdalen
This topic has been discussed before [1]. But I want to highlight it again since I'm working with the initial functional version of the PHP 5 port and IF we should do any changes to how log4php classes are named, this is the time to do it. As I see it we have two reasonable options here: 1) Ke