[lojban-beginners] Re: A new version of the lojban dictionary

2009-09-02 Thread Yoav Nir
Thanks, this is so weird. I have fixed this picture 6 months ago, but didn't copy the fixed PNG file to the directory where I build the document. I will fix it for the next edition (next month, probably) Thanks again. On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Luke Bergen wrote: > hmmm, in the cheat shee

[lojban-beginners] Re: A new version of the lojban dictionary

2009-09-02 Thread Luke Bergen
hmmm, in the cheat sheet section, wouldn't {ma'a} have all three people circled in yellow? On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Yoav Nir wrote: > coi rodo > > The 6th edition of the jbovlaste-based dictionary (in PDF) is available > from http://www.lojban.org/tiki/books > > Nothing new as far as fe

[lojban-beginners] A new version of the lojban dictionary

2009-09-02 Thread Yoav Nir
coi rodo The 6th edition of the jbovlaste-based dictionary (in PDF) is available from http://www.lojban.org/tiki/books Nothing new as far as features go, but the size has increased to 323 pages. I guess a lot of new stuff is being added to jbovlaste. Still looking for ideas/volunteers for some

[lojban-beginners] Re: SRSLY, this hasn't been about Klingon for a while, now.

2009-09-02 Thread Michael Eaton
I would apologise, Luke, but I'm far too busy chuckling quietly =D -Original Message- From: lojban-beginners-bou...@lojban.org [mailto:lojban-beginners-bou...@lojban.org]on Behalf Of Luke Bergen Sent: 02 September 2009 13:57 To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re:

[lojban-beginners] Re: SRSLY, this hasn't been about Klingon for a while, now.

2009-09-02 Thread Luke Bergen
Ok, this whole starting a new thread but replying to both the new and the old thread thing is making me look foolish. I just replied in the other thread with exactly "hence 'tend to' :-p". Damnit michael! :) On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Michael Eaton < michael.ea...@blackpool.gov.uk> wrote:

[lojban-beginners] Re: klingon swears

2009-09-02 Thread Luke Bergen
hence the "tend to" :-p On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Sara Brand wrote: > Not all of us do. I'm only barely following this discussion. > > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:50 AM, Michael Eaton < > michael.ea...@blackpool.gov.uk> wrote: > >> Ladies and gentlemen, I think we now have compelling eviden

[lojban-beginners] Re: SRSLY, this hasn't been about Klingon for a while, now.

2009-09-02 Thread Michael Eaton
Hence 'tend to' ;0). To be honest, Lojban is a very attractive language for someone familiar with programming, at least from my point of view, due to its logical rules and construction. The syntax is very absolute, and there is minimal interpretation of intended meaning compared to 'natural' l

[lojban-beginners] Re: klingon swears

2009-09-02 Thread Sara Brand
Not all of us do. I'm only barely following this discussion. On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:50 AM, Michael Eaton < michael.ea...@blackpool.gov.uk> wrote: > Ladies and gentlemen, I think we now have compelling evidence that > purveyors of Lojban tend to have a coding background. > > -Original Messag

[lojban-beginners] Re: klingon swears

2009-09-02 Thread Michael Eaton
Ladies and gentlemen, I think we now have compelling evidence that purveyors of Lojban tend to have a coding background. -Original Message- From: lojban-beginners-bou...@lojban.org [mailto:lojban-beginners-bou...@lojban.org]on Behalf Of Michael Turniansky Sent: 02 September 2009 12:45 To:

[lojban-beginners] Re: klingon swears

2009-09-02 Thread Michael Turniansky
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 5:07 AM, Michael Eaton wrote: > Also applies in SQL, where I use it most. To my knowledge, <> is the more > 'common' cousin to != > > > <> meaning 'not equals' has been around at least since 1983 > (Locomotive BASIC and IIRC all popular BASICs written after then) > > http:/

[lojban-beginners] Was klingon swears, is now signs of inequality ...

2009-09-02 Thread Colin Wright
Sorry if you see this twice. I accidently posted from an address from which I'm not registered. If the moderator passes it, you'll get a second copy. Adding my $0.02 On Wednesday 02 September 2009 06:49, David Gowers wrote: > <> meaning 'not equals' has been around at least since 1983 > (Loc

[lojban-beginners] Re: klingon swears

2009-09-02 Thread Michael Eaton
Also applies in SQL, where I use it most. To my knowledge, <> is the more 'common' cousin to != -Original Message- From: lojban-beginners-bou...@lojban.org [mailto:lojban-beginners-bou...@lojban.org]on Behalf Of David Gowers Sent: 02 September 2009 06:49 To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Su