[lojban-beginners] Re: Help! The Xorlo are attacking!

2010-02-13 Thread Jorge Llambías
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 4:44 PM, A. PIEKARSKI wrote: >> From: Jorge Llambías > >> At some point, after CLL and LfB were >> written, we decided that using "cmene" in English with this specialized >> meaning was a bad idea, because "cmene" doesn't mean and never meant that in >> Lojban. > > I under

[lojban-beginners] Re: Help! The Xorlo are attacking!

2010-02-13 Thread Jorge Llambías
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Jon "Top Hat" Jones wrote: > > Of course all {cmevla} are {cmene}, but not all {cmene} are {cmevla}. I would rather say all cmevla can be used as cmene, but not all cmene need be or consist of cmevla. Comparing cmevla and cmene is like comparing apples and desse

[lojban-beginners] Re: Help! The Xorlo are attacking!

2010-02-13 Thread A. PIEKARSKI
- Original Message > From: Jorge Llambías > To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org > Sent: Sat, February 13, 2010 10:19:50 AM > Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Help! The Xorlo are attacking! > > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 11:53 AM, A. PIEKARSKI <> > ymailto="mailto:to...@rogers.com"; > href=

[lojban-beginners] Re: Help! The Xorlo are attacking!

2010-02-13 Thread Jon "Top Hat" Jones
My mistake. But to clarify, my mistake was not caused by the LFB or CLL. I assumed that, since {la mlatu} is a word used as a name, that it was a {cmevla}, since a {cmene valsi} is a name-type-of-word, whereas {.aionys.}, which is only a name, is merely a {cmene}. Of course all {cmevla} are {cme

[lojban-beginners] Re: la orestis...grammar question

2010-02-13 Thread Ian Johnson
ki'e.ui Thank you for reminding me about {be} in particular; I think that's probably a better way to do it, since {mamta} and {patfu} are structured that way anyway. In retrospect I'd go so far as to say that a possessive construction here (except perhaps with po'e) is a little {malglico}. mu'omi

[lojban-beginners] Re: Help! The Xorlo are attacking!

2010-02-13 Thread Jorge Llambías
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 11:53 AM, A. PIEKARSKI wrote: > > No wonder everyone is confused!  Exactly where are cmene and cmevla > definitively defined? Are you asking about the meanings of the Lojban words, or the meanings of the English words borrowed from Lojban? The definitions in jbovlaste seem

[lojban-beginners] Re: Help! The Xorlo are attacking!

2010-02-13 Thread A. PIEKARSKI
No, > you got it completely reversed. cmevla refers to words than end in > a consonant, such as {aionys} and cmene refers to every word that is used as > a name (i.o.w. after {la}) such as in {la mlatu}. Unfortunately lojban > for beginners confuses the words somewhat. Actually, neither "L

[lojban-beginners] Re: Help! The Xorlo are attacking!

2010-02-13 Thread Timo Paulssen
Jon "Top Hat" Jones wrote: > One thing I want to mention: {la} is not only for cmene. It is the gadri > used for all cmevla. {la mlatu}, for instance, is a cmevla, whereas > {la.aionys.} is a cmene. No, you got it completely reversed. cmevla refers to words than end in a consonant, such as {aiony