On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 18:32:20 +0100, tijlan wrote:
I have another relevant question. Is the following translations of
Esperanto correct?
dudek du super kvin
rere fi'u mu
"rere fi'u mu" means 22 divided by 5.
Do you mean by "super" the binomial coefficient? If yes, it reads in
Esperanto "n s
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 2:32 PM, tijlan wrote:
>
> I have another relevant question. Is the following translations of
> Esperanto correct?
>
> dudek du super kvin
> rere fi'u mu
Sounds right.
> kvinono de tio
> fi'u mu ti
Sounds right, except "tio" should be "ta". "ti" is "ĉi tio".
> dudek du
*Is -> Are
2010/2/21 Jorge Llambías :
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 9:15 AM, tijlan wrote:
>> How does one express a division remainder in MEX? (CLL seems to have
>> no example of it.)
>>
>> 30 ÷ 7 = 4 ... 2
>> li cino fe'i ze du li vo ___
>
> Remainder is not really an operator. 22 ÷ 5 is also "4 with remainder
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 9:15 AM, tijlan wrote:
> How does one express a division remainder in MEX? (CLL seems to have
> no example of it.)
>
> 30 ÷ 7 = 4 ... 2
> li cino fe'i ze du li vo ___
Remainder is not really an operator. 22 ÷ 5 is also "4 with remainder
2", but 30 ÷ 7 and 22 ÷ 5 are not eq
How does one express a division remainder in MEX? (CLL seems to have
no example of it.)
30 ÷ 7 = 4 ... 2
li cino fe'i ze du li vo ___
ba'a ki'e lo jundi mu'o mi'e tijlan
