[lojban-beginners] Re: jai (now a question about {bo})

2009-08-27 Thread Luke Bergen
Ok, I will just keep plugging away and will most likely get it in time. You bring up an interesting side question though. {BO} wtf is going on there? I looked through the CLL and have found that the only official definition for it is the tanru use like {lo melbi cmalu bo nixli ckule} to mean

[lojban-beginners] Re: jai (now a question about {bo})

2009-08-27 Thread Michael Turniansky
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Luke Bergenlukeaber...@gmail.com wrote: Ok, I will just keep plugging away and will most likely get it in time. You bring up an interesting side question though.  {BO}  wtf is going on there?  I looked through the CLL and have found that the only official

[lojban-beginners] Re: jai (now a question about {bo})

2009-08-27 Thread Luke Bergen
Sorry, I was being un-necessarily hard on the CLL. Let me clarify. When I read through chapter 10 I was surprised to find them using +bo as a kind of terminator when it's not really a cmavo unto itself but almost like a suffix like english uses -ed, -ing, etc... which seemed very un-lojbanic to