[lojban-beginners] Re: la orestis...grammar question

2010-02-13 Thread Ian Johnson
ki'e.ui Thank you for reminding me about {be} in particular; I think that's probably a better way to do it, since {mamta} and {patfu} are structured that way anyway. In retrospect I'd go so far as to say that a possessive construction here (except perhaps with po'e) is a little {malglico}. mu'omi

[lojban-beginners] Re: la orestis...grammar question

2010-02-12 Thread Pierre Abbat
On Saturday 13 February 2010 00:16:48 Ian Johnson wrote: > Simple enough: is this grammatically correct, or am I missing something? > > Note: Orestiad spoilers. > > la .orestis. catra le vo'a mamta mu'i lonu vo'e catra le vo'a patfu > > I mainly ask because I'm incorporating a pretty good number of