On 12/02/2001 at 18:55 +, David H. Adler wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 05:44:04PM +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
>>
>> talking of organisational skills, dave (ad) how would you fancy
>> being a london.pm organiser for the london.pm trip to ny.pm?
>>
>> we seem to have problems getting anyone t
> Greg, if you send me the list of names and addresses I'd be chuffed.
> (Anyone who didn't email Greg, let me know).
>
done in a few seconds
> Given that sort of info, how much is this likely to cost? Dave? Dave?
> Dave? Bueller?
>
there is not enough of `Bueller'-ing on this list
> [0] Whe
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 07:15:59PM +, Paul Mison wrote:
>
> We could go for Wed 28 March to Mon 2 April instead; comments?
>
> Greg, if you send me the list of names and addresses I'd be chuffed.
> (Anyone who didn't email Greg, let me know).
>
> Given that sort of info, how much is this li
* David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 07:15:59PM +, Paul Mison wrote:
> >
> > We could go for Wed 28 March to Mon 2 April instead; comments?
> >
> > Greg, if you send me the list of names and addresses I'd be chuffed.
> > (Anyone who didn't email Greg, let me
Paul Mison wrote:
> I'll welcome the help.
Consider this me co-volunteering then.
> We could go for Wed 28 March to Mon 2 April instead; comments?
London.pm does April Fools' in NY. Hmm. Distinct possibilities. Means I
skip the flight home to go see my Dad on his birthday (also April 1 -
ex
On 12/02/2001 at 19:36 +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>> Well, now that you have something to work with, I can get the querying
>> in motion...
>>
>> About how many people are we talking about? Any idea?
>
>i just sent a list of about 8~10 people ( i th
* Paul Mison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Yeah, 10 +- usual errors (people who didn't know and have changed their
> minds, people running out of cash, etc, etc).
>
there is even someone saying that they are hoping to get Oven to send
them to NY at some stage ;-)
Greg
(remember Ron and I may
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 07:50:32PM +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> there is even someone saying that they are hoping to get Oven to send
> them to NY at some stage ;-)
I think you're confusing us with the armed posse going over the Oven NY to
demand their money. Oh, hang on, some of us *are* tha
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 07:37:14PM +, Paul Mison wrote:
> On 12/02/2001 at 19:36 +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> > David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> >> Well, now that you have something to work with, I can get the querying
> >> in motion...
> >>
> >> About how many people are we t
On 12/02/2001 at 19:59 +, David H. Adler wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 07:37:14PM +, Paul Mison wrote:
>> On 12/02/2001 at 19:36 +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
>> > David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> >
>> >> Well, now that you have something to work with, I can get the
>>querying
Paul Mison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 12/02/2001 at 19:59 +, David H. Adler wrote:
> >On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 07:37:14PM +, Paul Mison wrote:
> >> On 12/02/2001 at 19:36 +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> >> > David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Well, now that you h
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 08:18:26PM +, Paul Mison wrote:
> On 12/02/2001 at 19:59 +, David H. Adler wrote:
> >FWIW, 10 is commonly the minimum for a "group". A group rate isn't the
> >only way to go, but it's one option...
>
> Hmm. I assume group is cheaper, though.
You'd be surprised..
Piers Cawley wrote:
> > Hmm. I assume group is cheaper, though. Well, of the list, I'd be
> > surprised if that many dropped out, and I had stupidly forgotten Grep's
> > interest, so that takes us up to 12. Which may be enough to guarantee a
> > group. Aah, tricksy.
>
> Am I down as interested? I
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 04:32:08PM -0500, Mike Jarvis wrote:
>
> When looking at cost, remember what hotel rates in NYC are like (almost as
> bad as London). You can easily pay US$250/night for a room that you would
> swear is in a crack house.
But the crack is *great*!
:-)
--
David H. Adler
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 04:36:56PM -0500, David H. Adler wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 04:32:08PM -0500, Mike Jarvis wrote:
> >
> > When looking at cost, remember what hotel rates in NYC are like (almost as
> > bad as London). You can easily pay US$250/night for a room that you would
> > swea
David H. Adler wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 04:32:08PM -0500, Mike Jarvis wrote:
> >
> > When looking at cost, remember what hotel rates in NYC are like
> (almost as
> > bad as London). You can easily pay US$250/night for a room
> that you would
> > swear is in a crack house.
>
> But the
"Mike Jarvis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David H. Adler wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 04:32:08PM -0500, Mike Jarvis wrote:
> > >
> > > When looking at cost, remember what hotel rates in NYC are like
> > (almost as
> > > bad as London). You can easily pay US$250/night for a room
> > th
* Mike Jarvis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Piers Cawley wrote:
>
> > > Hmm. I assume group is cheaper, though. Well, of the list, I'd be
> > > surprised if that many dropped out, and I had stupidly forgotten Grep's
> > > interest, so that takes us up to 12. Which may be enough to guarantee a
> >
Mike Jarvis wrote:
>
> David H. Adler wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 04:32:08PM -0500, Mike Jarvis wrote:
> > >
> > > When looking at cost, remember what hotel rates in NYC are like
> > (almost as
> > > bad as London). You can easily pay US$250/night for a room
> > that you would
> > > swear
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 08:48:36AM +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> * Mike Jarvis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Piers Cawley wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
>
> but american hotels are so much better ... they have those giant 3-person
> size beds, almost all of them have minibars, decent showers and the s
At 11:00 AM 13.2.2001 +, Steve Purkis wrote:
>Mike Jarvis wrote:
>>
>> David H. Adler wrote:
>> > On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 04:32:08PM -0500, Mike Jarvis wrote:
>> > >
>> > > When looking at cost, remember what hotel rates in NYC are like
>> > > (almost as bad as London). You can easily pay US
LLIAMSLEA
From: 'WLG-FAX-01_ChineseWall_Demon'@williamslea.com
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 08:39:46 +
Subject: ChineseWall Job External Mail Re: Re: NY invasion, was Re: Conway
Hall
MIMEsweeper ChineseWall
Ser
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 08:39:46 +0000
> Subject: ChineseWall Job External Mail Re: Re: NY invasion, was Re: Conway
>Hall
>
>
> MIMEsweeper ChineseWall
> Server: CN=WLG-FAX-01/O=WilliamsLea
>
>--
At 09:15 13/02/2001 +, you wrote:
>three guesses what happened when i forward its own message containing the sh*t
>word to the list ;-)
>
Ok, ok, I'm sorry !
Yet another piece of junk from our mail admin team. The irony being that
they deliver it anyway !
Having now got this nice new emai
24 matches
Mail list logo
