Robin Szemeti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, you wrote:
>
> > > to wit, testing of object based modules. Firstly what do people generally
> > > use for this? Test::Unit ?? or is there something more freindly out
> > > there?
> >
> > Test::Unit *almost* does the right thing,
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, you wrote:
> > to wit, testing of object based modules. Firstly what do people generally
> > use for this? Test::Unit ?? or is there something more freindly out
> > there?
>
> Test::Unit *almost* does the right thing, but looking through the code
> there are some horrible th
Robin Szemeti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Rightio ...
>
> since its a Tuesday and also a waning 3/4 moon its *New Methodology Day*
> and the random choice from Big Ted's bookcase was XP::Installed
>
> to wit, testing of object based modules. Firstly what do people generally
> use for this? Te
Rightio ...
since its a Tuesday and also a waning 3/4 moon its *New Methodology Day*
and the random choice from Big Ted's bookcase was XP::Installed
to wit, testing of object based modules. Firstly what do people generally
use for this? Test::Unit ?? or is there something more freindly out
there
