Greg McCarroll wrote:
Out of interest, who here, in the last year or so have avoided getting
involved in some project, such as NMS, Perl Certification, One day
conferences, early P5EE discussions etc. etc. Because they felt they
were too junior or too outside the circle to be involved. Or
Jonathan Stowe wrote:
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Kåre Olai Lindbach wrote:
nondrinking (Jonathan Stowe then suggested that
London.pm was out of the question) ...
Well ? are there any non-drinking London.pmers going to
M\N{LATIN SMALL LETTER U WITH DIAERESIS}nchen ?
Yes, I am.
Anybody know somebody actually using the formmail.pl from NMS? I read
on news.admin.net-abuse.email this morning that people are noticing a
surge in probes for formmail.pl, for use by spammers.
Might be nice to get a success story or two up on the page. Hell,
success stories from users for any
I received an alert from the FBI about Matt's version of Formail. Might
be a reasonable quote. I'll dig out the (public) reference to it if
wanted.
Richard
-Original Message-
From: Mike Jarvis [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 February 2002 10:29
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
On 11 Feb 2002, Mike Jarvis wrote:
Anybody know somebody actually using the formmail.pl from NMS? I read
on news.admin.net-abuse.email this morning that people are noticing a
surge in probes for formmail.pl, for use by spammers.
I use it one one small site that we migrated from another ISP
On Mon, 11 Feb 2002 09:30:12 +0100, you (Newton, Philip
[EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Jonathan Stowe wrote:
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Kåre Olai Lindbach wrote:
nondrinking (Jonathan Stowe then suggested that
London.pm was out of the question) ...
Well ? are there any non-drinking
I know ybw.com were getting spam sent across there old formail.pl, I
told the admin there about NMS and he dropped in the replacement and
was impressed.
-- mallum
on Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 05:29:27AM -0500, Mike Jarvis wrote:
Anybody know somebody actually using the formmail.pl from NMS? I
Kåre Olai Lindbach skrev i meddelande[1]:
On Mon, 11 Feb 2002 09:30:12 +0100, you (Newton, Philip
[EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Jonathan Stowe wrote:
Well ? are there any non-drinking London.pmers going to
M\N{LATIN SMALL LETTER U WITH DIAERESIS}nchen ?
Yes, I am.
I didn't know that
On Mon, 11 Feb 2002, Newton, Philip wrote:
I think so. Just like, say, dha is a London.pmer. At any rate, I consider
myself one; what Paul thinks might be different ;)
You subscribe to the list. You're a member.
It's not like we issue badges[1] or passports you know.
plug Of course if you
Mark Fowler wrote:
plug Of course if you consider yourself to be a real london
perl monger then you'll buy a tshirt...
http://www.thegestalt.org/tshirts/ /plug
How many are left, then?
And how much to ship to Germany? Or maybe I'll just pick one up in Munich in
September; I might even have
Mike Jarvis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 2002-02-11 at 06:11, Simon Wilcox wrote:
I shall, I'm interested to make sure that NMS has closed whatever hole is
being probed for.
Perhaps some of us (and I'm happy to help here) should poke around on
more newsfroups, find places where
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 12:16:44PM -, Jonathan McKeown wrote:
and on Sunday 10 February 2002 01:31 + Richard Clamp wrote:
[and how he does deeply disturbing perlguts-type stuff but doesn't want to
discuss it on london.pm in case he scares people]
And also that there are scary people
* Richard Clamp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Greg, did you get anyone responding to your question off-list?
yes quite a few people, im going to post my theories in the next few
days, please remember that london.pm is just a test case here, my
theories are more to do with online societies in
13 matches
Mail list logo
