--- On Mon, 20/10/08, Alistair MacLeod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suspect a simple backpropagating multilayer perceptron
> should do ok
> for this but I have not really used these in anger before.
>
> My questions for the perlmongers:
>
> 1. Is a perceptron the best approach? How else could
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 03:56:21PM +0100, Alistair MacLeod said:
> I suspect a simple backpropagating multilayer perceptron should do ok
> for this but I have not really used these in anger before.
That was my thought as well, after a brief read over your mail.
The ORA book "Programming Collectiv
Hi,
I have a (multi)function of three variables and two outputs that I
need to be learnt from examples. The inputs are are slightly
correlated with each other. The outputs will also be. The function is
not at all smooth - there are many irregular peaks. Training data will
be generated as the syste
2008/10/20 Jonathan Stowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Well looking at the original message more carefully, unless Tielman is
> actually the spammer himself, then there does appear to be a way of
> causing gmail to send messages as a third party to everyone in that
> third party's contact list.
I was
On 20 Oct 2008, at 10:24, Jonathan Stowe wrote:
Well looking at the original message more carefully, unless Tielman is
actually the spammer himself, then there does appear to be a way of
causing gmail to send messages as a third party to everyone in that
third party's contact list.
Indeed, no
2008/10/20 Paul Makepeace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 8:11 AM, Jonathan Stowe
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 2008-10-18 at 14:27 +0100, Martin A. Brooks wrote:
>> > Jonathan Stowe wrote:
>> > > Anyone know a good way of stopping joe-jobbed spam which doesn't
>> involve
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 8:11 AM, Jonathan Stowe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-10-18 at 14:27 +0100, Martin A. Brooks wrote:
> > Jonathan Stowe wrote:
> > > Anyone know a good way of stopping joe-jobbed spam which doesn't
> involve
> > > spf and stuff ?
> > >
> >
> > Don't have a catchal