On 22 Apr 2009, at 15:04, Chris Jack wrote:
I too noticed some of the links were broken to London Perl Monger
talks - in particular some of the talks Ivor Williams gave. Some of
these seem to have moved to http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/ivorw/slides
and also http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/ivorw/sl
L?on Brocard wrote:
> Alias ranted: http://use.perl.org/~Alias/journal/38842
>
> Which Perl website do you think looks the worst? Which has the worst
> navigation?
>
> We managed to redesign london.pm.org. Is it time to do another?
Some aspects of good/bad design are fairly universal, but I t
> James Laver james.la...@gmail.com wrote:
> As L?on has just posted to the list, slides from the last techmeet are
> now available in PDF format from the london.pm website.
> It would be really nice if we could dig up as many past slides as
> possible and host them on london.pm.or
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 01:38:49PM +0200, Abigail wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:20:03PM +0100, Simon Wilcox wrote:
> > http://www.digitalcraftsmen.net/perl.org/slice.png
> IMO. No. Not by a long shot. It's screamy, it hurts your eyes,
> and doesn't invite you at all to stay long enough to ev
2009/4/22 Simon Wilcox :
> My point was DO or DO NOT there is no "let's all bitch and moan on a mailing
> list, get ourselves in a tizzy and do naff all about it".
Well said.
Also - let's be really clear on one thing: proper design is VERY hard.
This means that when someone has a go and tries to
On 22/4/09 13:16, Dirk Koopman wrote:
Simon Wilcox wrote:
http://combust.develooper.com/
I don't suppose combust can be persuaded to work as an FCGI device
instead of an antediluvian mod_perl thingy?
Dunno. Send patches if you get it working :-)
S.
As Léon has just posted to the list, slides from the last techmeet are
now available in PDF format from the london.pm website.
It would be really nice if we could dig up as many past slides as
possible and host them on london.pm.org. A lot of links to slides on
other sites are now dead, whi
2009/4/1 Léon Brocard :
> The next technical meeting will be on the 17th April 2009 from 7pm to
> 9pm (you may arrive from 6.30pm, sign in at the reception) and the
> theme is "Less code". You have to sign up to attend, see the website.
Thanks to all the speakers, it rocked! Slides are available
On 22/4/09 12:38, Abigail wrote:
IMO. No. [snip]
Sorry, that was a rhetorical question. I wasn't meaning to open it up
for a discussion.
My point was DO or DO NOT there is no "let's all bitch and moan on a
mailing list, get ourselves in a tizzy and do naff all about it".
Yes the colour is
Simon Wilcox wrote:
http://combust.develooper.com/
I don't suppose combust can be persuaded to work as an FCGI device
instead of an antediluvian mod_perl thingy?
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Abigail wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:20:03PM +0100, Simon Wilcox wrote:
>> On 22/4/09 11:09, Sue Spence wrote:
>>> 2009/4/22 Léon Brocard :
Alias ranted: http://use.perl.org/~Alias/journal/38842
Which Perl website do you think looks the worst
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 13:38 +0200, Abigail wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:20:03PM +0100, Simon Wilcox wrote:
> > BTDT. Is this any better ?
> >
> > http://www.digitalcraftsmen.net/perl.org/slice.png
>
> IMO. No. Not by a long shot. It's screamy, it hurts your eyes,
> and doesn't invite you a
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:20:03PM +0100, Simon Wilcox wrote:
> On 22/4/09 11:09, Sue Spence wrote:
>> 2009/4/22 Léon Brocard :
>>> Alias ranted: http://use.perl.org/~Alias/journal/38842
>>>
>>> Which Perl website do you think looks the worst? Which has the worst
>>> navigation?
>>>
>>> We managed
On 22/4/09 11:09, Sue Spence wrote:
2009/4/22 Léon Brocard :
Alias ranted: http://use.perl.org/~Alias/journal/38842
Which Perl website do you think looks the worst? Which has the worst navigation?
We managed to redesign london.pm.org. Is it time to do another?
perl.org - hello, 1996
BTDT
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 07:53:31AM +0100, Léon Brocard wrote:
> Alias ranted: http://use.perl.org/~Alias/journal/38842
>
> Which Perl website do you think looks the worst? Which has the worst
> navigation?
>
> We managed to redesign london.pm.org. Is it time to do another?
Of all the websites
2009/4/22 Léon Brocard :
> Alias ranted: http://use.perl.org/~Alias/journal/38842
>
> Which Perl website do you think looks the worst? Which has the worst
> navigation?
>
> We managed to redesign london.pm.org. Is it time to do another?
>
perl.org - hello, 1996
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 07:53:31AM +0100, Léon Brocard wrote:
> Which Perl website do you think looks the worst? Which has the worst
> navigation?
It's as much about the content as its presentation, but I have a
certain fondness for a particular entry in the CPAN FAQ:
http://cpan.org/misc/cpan-faq
On 22/4/09 07:53, Léon Brocard wrote:
Alias ranted: http://use.perl.org/~Alias/journal/38842
Which Perl website do you think looks the worst? Which has the worst navigation?
We managed to redesign london.pm.org. Is it time to do another?
They're all a bit shit for the most part. Last time we
Alias ranted: http://use.perl.org/~Alias/journal/38842
Which Perl website do you think looks the worst? Which has the worst navigation?
We managed to redesign london.pm.org. Is it time to do another?
Leon
19 matches
Mail list logo
