On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 10:13:05PM +0100, marcos rebelo wrote:
> Since the offer of a Long Term Contract seem too easy, I was trying to
> understand:
> - in which situation may a Organization fire a person that has a Long
> Term Contract?
Broadly speaking, failure to perform your duties, gross m
On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 15:32 +, David Cantrell wrote:
> Permanent employees are entitled to 20 days (I think) paid leave every
> year at minimum, including public holidays.
28 including. Used to be 20 excluding.
(Which is the same thing for office worker purposes, but the new
phrasing means t
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 16:32, David Cantrell wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 10:13:05PM +0100, marcos rebelo wrote:
>
>> Since the offer of a Long Term Contract seem too easy, I was trying to
>> understand:
>> - in which situation may a Organization fire a person that has a Long
>> Term Contract
On 4 March 2011 15:32, David Cantrell wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 10:13:05PM +0100, marcos rebelo wrote:
>> - How much do a Organization pays as Indemnization in case of firing?
>
> Errm, what does that mean? If you mean to ask how much of a pay-off do
> you get, it depends on the contract.
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 04:48:52PM +0100, marcos rebelo wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 16:32, David Cantrell wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 10:13:05PM +0100, marcos rebelo wrote:
> >> Since the offer of a Long Term Contract seem too easy, I was trying to
> >> understand:
> >> - in which situ
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 03:52:10PM +, Dominic Thoreau wrote:
> On 4 March 2011 15:32, David Cantrell wrote:
> > Permanent employees are entitled to 20 days (I think) paid leave every
> > year at minimum, including public holidays.
> 20 if it public holidays don't come out of it, 27 if they do.
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 04:48:52PM +0100, marcos rebelo wrote:
[...]
> In this point, the Organization may change my work and after say that is
> no longer needed. Being fired because of that.
That's unfair dismissal. You can, and probably should, sue in that case. In
such a simple abuse of the re