Nicholas Clark wrote:
Would they care more if they got lots of polite bug reports from registered
developers who care about Apple's SNAFU, encouraging Apple to re-instate the
PPC assembler for XCode 4? Is XCode 4*supposed* to support the PPC-enabled
OS X versions? Or is it "Lion only"?
It's
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 07:50:14PM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 02:10:57AM +0100, me said:
> > That said - it's still highly ... let's call it "suboptimal" that if you
> > install the latest versions of the tools you can't install XS modules on
> > OSX.
>
> FWIW I wrote s
On 26 April 2011 16:04, Mike Whiting wrote:
> Looking for an opportunity to cross-train to Perl.
Since your CV mentions you've some knowledge/experience of the
Catalyst web framework, why not hop onto that project's IRC channel
(irc.perl.org#catalyst) and ask for ideas of things to hack on? If
yo
Looking for an opportunity to cross-train to Perl.
Please find my CV here: http://mikew.co/resume
Thanks
> Once 5.14.0 is out, I'm hoping to suggest placing IO::Socket::IP in core
> too, alongside the older ::INET.
>
That sounds like a *very* good idea.
Ciao
Richard
--
Richard Foley
Ciao - shorter than AufWiederSehen!
http://www.rfi.net/books.html
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 02:02:59PM +0100, Dunca
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Simon Cozens wrote:
> I don't get it. I've never used anything other than system Perl all the time
> I've been using OS X, and I don't recall any problems.
A System Update back in 2009 broke IO.pm if you'd updated it from CPAN
http://bulknews.typepad.com/blog/20
On 23/04/2011 13:46, Sue Spence wrote:
>> Beyond installing my own Perl
>
> Do this. Best to ignore the system Perl IMO.
I don't get it. I've never used anything other than system Perl all the time
I've been using OS X, and I don't recall any problems. (Of course, that may be
the RDF talking.) I
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 02:02:59PM +0100, Duncan Garland wrote:
> What's the situation now? Anybody doing a high-level search on the subject
> is going to get the impression that Perl is "harmful". It's clear that this
> is an exaggeration, but it's not clear whether or not the problem has been
> s
