OpenTech

2013-05-06 Thread Dave Cross
After a year off last year, OpenTech is back this year. OpenTech is a great conference, I've been to every one and I highly recommend that you go. Their web site describes it like this: "OpenTech 2013 is an informal, low cost, one-day conference on slightly different approaches to technology

Re: Number::Fraction

2013-05-06 Thread James Laver
Jesus, I thought my mail was long… Apols in advance... On 6 May 2013, at 21:13, Th. J. van Hoesel wrote: > After reading it three times, I have a slight feeling that I have bitten of > more then I can chew... and it was such a small bite already, couldn't find a > smaller module, so little co

Re: Number::Fraction

2013-05-06 Thread Th. J. van Hoesel
James, thank you so much for writing such a great email. =[ PLEASE JUMP TO THE END OF THIS MAIL ]= After reading it three times, I have a slight feeling that I have bitten of more then I can chew... and it was such a small bite already, couldn't find

Re: Number::Fraction

2013-05-06 Thread James Laver
On 6 May 2013, at 13:57, "Th. J. van Hoesel" wrote: > > What if people figured out that the method did accept 3 or more arguments > (why and how.. because they dug into the code ?). It would make no sensense > at all to call the method Number::Fraction->new( 1, 4, 6, 7, 2), but it would > prod

Re: Number::Fraction

2013-05-06 Thread Th. J. van Hoesel
Op 3 mei 2013, om 12:34 heeft Dave Cross het volgende geschreven: > Quoting "Th. J. van Hoesel" : > >> >> Op 3 mei 2013, om 10:21 heeft Dave Cross het volgende geschreven: >> >>> Quoting "Th. J. van Hoesel" : >>> to me, it would make sense for 3 parameters: Number::Fraction->(