Don't use system Perl. Brew your own and make it part of the app.
Sent from my iPhone
On 22 Jul 2013, at 23:04, Pierre M wrote:
> Thank you, all. That's very good advice.
>
> Yup, the main thing is to make money before it runs out. Abigail, your
> comments to Ovid's blog post (about testing) w
Thank you, all. That's very good advice.
Yup, the main thing is to make money before it runs out. Abigail, your
comments to Ovid's blog post (about testing) were just what i needed to
read at the time, on this subject.
Summary of the ideas so far:
- it depends on the size of the project
- don't r
neal stephenson's Cryptonomicon, starts with a story about a tech guy who
implemented some other guy's idea for a part in the company and ends up
(not spoiling) getting screwed .
it is a very enjoyable book .
i found it also very entertaining because it rang so true, i personally
know 2 people ,
On 22/07/13 19:45, Pierre M wrote:
As i was asking for advice in a previous email, Dirk Koopman wrote:
"Use the lowest impact perl from the beginning (that probably means
avoiding Moose, Catapole et al)."
I understand that this means: "avoid modules with lots of dependencies". Is
that right? I t
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 07:45:28PM +0100, Pierre M wrote:
> As i was asking for advice in a previous email, Dirk Koopman wrote:
> "Use the lowest impact perl from the beginning (that probably means
> avoiding Moose, Catapole et al)."
>
> I understand that this means: "avoid modules with lots of de
On 22 July 2013 19:45, Pierre M wrote:
> As i was asking for advice in a previous email, Dirk Koopman wrote:
> "Use the lowest impact perl from the beginning (that probably means
> avoiding Moose, Catapole et al)."
>
> I understand that this means: "avoid modules with lots of dependencies". Is
> t
On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 17:35 +, dave.lamb...@gmail.com wrote:
> I have had good results in the past on resistive websites with
> WWW::Selenium.
Thanks. That will be my fallback if the website is more complicated than
I originally thought (it's several years old, so hoping it doesn't have
much/a
I'm doing a kind of moonlighty startup thingy - my collaborators are not
Perl people and I decided to make a (Dancer/DBIx::Class:Schema powered) web
API to do all the heavy lifting - they will do all the user interface and
production scalability stuff. Fingers crossed it works - has to be done by
> Otherwise WWW::Mechanize.
Wow, thanks for that, that was easy. Works well on a test website, just
need to try on said clunky HR system tomorrow :)
On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 19:45 +0100, Pierre M wrote:
> As i was asking for advice in a previous email, Dirk Koopman wrote:
> "Use the lowest impact perl from the beginning (that probably means
> avoiding Moose, Catapole et al)."
Surely you need to have an idea of the scale of the project before
maki
As i was asking for advice in a previous email, Dirk Koopman wrote:
"Use the lowest impact perl from the beginning (that probably means
avoiding Moose, Catapole et al)."
I understand that this means: "avoid modules with lots of dependencies". Is
that right? I thought Moose only slowed things down
Oh, it's nice to feel supported. Individual answers follow.
@Dave: Great, thank you! I'm sending you a personal email.
@Ash: i'll keep your contact if i have further questions or doubts. It's
nice to have several possible persons to speak with.
@Mark: thanks for the links.
@Dinis: i've read one
If said clunky HR website requires javascript, WWW::Selenium or
WWW::Mechanize::Firefox.
Otherwise WWW::Mechanize.
(Other things may work too, but those are what I have had success with.)
I have had good results in the past on resistive websites with WWW::Selenium.
It was straightforward to get running under Ubuntu, but does require a full
browser and an x server. I hear phantom.js is good, and has a Perl wrapper.
--
Sent using from a tiny keypad.
-Original Message-
Fro
Hi,
Quick question: has anybody had any success installing WWW::Webkit on
Debian (v7.1) or Linux Mint (v12)?
I won't list all the problems that I am having just now (suffice to say
they are various recursive dependency failures that I don't want to
spend lots of time on). I'm more interested to k
More than happy to talk IRL. I'm in Hoxditch or Camden.
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Dinis Rebolo wrote:
> Hi Peirre, have you read the blogs Ovid has about startups?
>
> http://blogs.perl.org/users/ovid/2013/07/perl-startups-lacuna-expanse.html
> http://blogs.perl.org/users/ovid/2013/07/pe
Hi Peirre, have you read the blogs Ovid has about startups?
http://blogs.perl.org/users/ovid/2013/07/perl-startups-lacuna-expanse.html
http://blogs.perl.org/users/ovid/2013/07/perl-startups-lokkunestoria.html
Good luck with your new project.
drebolo
On 22 July 2013 15:39, Pierre M wrote:
> Hi
Or at the tech meet :)
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
> More than happy to talk IRL. I'm in Hoxditch or Camden.
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Dinis Rebolo wrote:
>
>> Hi Peirre, have you read the blogs Ovid has about startups?
>>
>> http://blogs.perl.org/users/
These guys seem to have some useful events. Haven't been myself, but my
business partner pops along and has made a number of useful contacts:
http://www.3-beards.com/
We'll both be along at the Digital Sizzle 10 thing in a month's time.
HTH
Mark
On 07/22/2013 03:39 PM, Pierre M wrote:
Hi Mo
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:09:01AM +0100, Leon Brocard wrote:
> London Perl Mongers organises technical meetings every two months. The
> technical meetings are a chance to find out what has been going on in
> the Perl community, what techniques people are using and how Perl
> integrates with other
Hi Mongers,
we're starting a project in autumn with a non-programmer friend. He's got
the ideas, the clients-base and the money. I have the time, a pretty clear
idea of what he wants, and the mathematical + programming skills. I'm
thinking of using Dancer2.
I'd like to speak with someone who has s
21 matches
Mail list logo
