i can't help but repost this
http://xkcd.com/327/
-- vish
On 10 June 2014 07:26, Roger Bell_West ro...@firedrake.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:59:57AM +0100, Chris Jack wrote:
Can I suggest you consider including some rudimentary idea of cost
when you're deciding whether to allow
i like followup.cc
and followupthen.com
for things like that.
you forward an email you want to be reminded of to
[nextThursday|oct31st|9am]@followup.cc and it responds on the day/time
extra functionality if you also address other people, and put the
@followup.cc in the CC or BCC addresses.
--
here is a non official way to do so without logging in (for a few attempts,
with- for more)
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17080127/api-alternative-to-google-trends/18082512#18082512
it works - i just tested it
link for the lazy
I would agree that the problem is ill posed.
a formal (and therefor solvable ) definition would be e.g. by defining the
cost of a solution and minimizing it.
e.g. for each student, for each of his two courses his personal cost for
that course is the square of his raking.
(so if he ranked it 4,
wait, aren't $a and $b special ?
(they magically live for {$a=$b} etc. )
-- vish
On 14 August 2013 04:07, William Blunn bill+london...@blunn.org wrote:
On 14/08/2013 01:17, Adrian Lai wrote:
The use of @$fields is sufficient to autovivify $fields as an array ref.
Hmmm. Ish.
/In the
neal stephenson's Cryptonomicon, starts with a story about a tech guy who
implemented some other guy's idea for a part in the company and ends up
(not spoiling) getting screwed .
it is a very enjoyable book .
i found it also very entertaining because it rang so true, i personally
know 2 people ,
no,
this
http://perl.plover.com/IAQ/IAQlist.html#how_can_i_find_the_creation_date_of_a_file
is mean.
:-)
-- vish
On 12 December 2012 09:35, Anthony Lucas anthonyjlu...@gmail.com wrote:
I wouldn't really say mean…
The examples themselves trigger the module's own ridiculous failure
is a
second killing.
-- vish
On 12 December 2012 10:14, Spiros Denaxas s.dena...@gmail.com wrote:
That is plain immature.
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Avishalom Shalit avisha...@gmail.com
wrote:
no,
this
http://perl.plover.com/IAQ/IAQlist.html
ok now that the subject line has changed to reflect the interview process,
here is what i think the ideal interview is (experienced this both as
interviewee and as hiring manager.)
it should be a very short internship,
i.e. here is a masked part of a problem we are working on, lets discuss
this
I remember meeting someone who knew what the sequence was but forgot the
name.
Ended up calling it the Fettucini sequence.
Bonus points.
-- vish
On 4 September 2012 14:12, Piers Cawley
pdcawley-london.0dd...@bofh.org.ukwrote:
On 4 September 2012 14:17, Dave Cross d...@dave.org.uk wrote:
crawling ?
xml parsing ?
json printing of structures ?
-- vish
On 4 September 2012 17:18, David Hodgkinson daveh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 Sep 2012, at 16:07, Smylers smyl...@stripey.com wrote:
Piers Cawley writes:
Tower of Hanoi is always a better example for solving with
hi, first post (so far just lurked , and did not attend any meeting),
so i'll introduce myself
I am an algorithm developer, living in london , originally from israel,
i hope that this mailing list is the right outlet for this post
we are looking for someone to join our algorithm analytics
thanks
i will not make it today,
and thanks for the tips
-- vish
On 3 November 2011 15:10, Nicholas Clark n...@ccl4.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 02:46:31PM +, Avishalom Shalit wrote:
hi, first post (so far just lurked , and did not attend any meeting),
so i'll introduce myself
13 matches
Mail list logo
