Hi,
About 9 months ago we asked New Relic about Perl bindings for their
web-monitoring software and we're told that there weren't any.
A couple of weeks ago New Relic contacted me and said that they now have an
SDK in beta which is aimed at allowing dynamic languages which do not
already ha
Is there going to be a Perl stall or a dev room at the next Fosdem?
Duncan
Do you want to come out to Thames Ditton? It's a bit of a hike, but if
you're interested I'll see what I can do.
-Original Message-
From: london.pm-boun...@london.pm.org
[mailto:london.pm-boun...@london.pm.org] On Behalf Of James Laver
Sent: 15 May 2013 23:20
To: London.pm Perl M[ou]ngers
lege leavers... they're all wondering what they're going to be doing
come June/July.
As for wfh, I've done it for about 10 years now. One previous employer
operated solely on this basis. Staff turnover was minimal. It occasionally
didn't work out due to distractions/it not
lege leavers... they're all wondering what they're going to be doing
come June/July.
As for wfh, I've done it for about 10 years now. One previous employer
operated solely on this basis. Staff turnover was minimal. It occasionally
didn't work out due to distractions/it not
Hi,
We're advertising for a Perl programmer again, and once again we are
struggling. It's a shame because we've got quite a lot of development work
in the offing, mostly using Catalyst, DBIx::Class, Moose and the like.
I spoke to the agent today and asked why so few people are coming forwar
Hi,
Southampton PM (http://southampton.pm.org/) meet at the Platform Tavern
(http://www.platformtavern.com/) at 8pm on the first Wednesday of every
month. That means Wednesday is a meet night.
It's about a year since the group was revived. There have normally been
between six and ten of us.
m.org] On Behalf Of Wendy G.A. van Dijk
Sent: 26 January 2013 18:27
To: London.pm Perl M[ou]ngers
Subject: RE: We get a dev-room at Fosdem after all. Emergency Call for
Papers!
Hai Duncan,
At 06:44 PM 1/26/2013, Duncan Garland wrote:
>TPF posted a couple of days ago that it has £100,000 (or do
t TPF, YEF, EPO and SPPN have not enough people to organise or coordinate
workshops or conferences themselves.
This is not meant patronising. This is also a statement for many other
people who have said the same as you did, I have heard and read ithis
question before.
Kind regards,
Wendy van dijk
hes
Leo
On 26 January 2013 14:05, Duncan Garland
wrote:
> Hi Leo,
>
> I ran a workshop at this year's LPW.
>
> I got the company I work for to sponsor LPW.
>
> All the sponsorship money went to LPW, I paid my own expenses.
>
> I'll know next week whether
ngers
Subject: Re: We get a dev-room at Fosdem after all. Emergency Call for
Papers!
Hi Duncan,
Please contact the TPF and let them know how many hours a week you are able
to commit to helping co-ordinate this sort of thing.
Leo
On 26 Jan 2013, at 11:25, Duncan Garland
wrote:
> Hi,
>
&
12:06
To: London.pm Perl M[ou]ngers
Subject: Re: We get a dev-room at Fosdem after all. Emergency Call for
Papers!
Hi Duncan,
Please contact the TPF and let them know how many hours a week you are able
to commit to helping co-ordinate this sort of thing.
Leo
On 26 Jan 2013, at 11:25, Duncan Ga
Hi,
Isn't this something TPF should get behind?
The Perl Community organises good conferences but they tend to be for quite
small audiences. I've been told that YAPC Tokyo is the biggest with roughly
800 attendees and the next biggest ones are grouped around the 300 mark.
Fosdem claims to attra
Hi,
Finally got round to creating a slideshare account and uploading the stuff
from the LPW 2012 Template::Toolkit Workshop.
http://www.slideshare.net/duncanmg/code-from-lpw-2012-templatetoolkit-worksh
op
http://www.slideshare.net/duncanmg/introduction-to-templatetoolkit
Sorry for the
Hi,
We're talking about £100k a year here. That's 1000 people world-wide
donating £100 per year. That doesn't sound too unreasonable. There must be
far more people than that who have a vested interest in seeing Perl do well.
(There was more Perl is nonsense on the web last week.)
I can't see
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: london.pm-boun...@london.pm.org
[mailto:london.pm-boun...@london.pm.org] On Behalf Of Paul LeoNerd Evans
Sent: 26 April 2011 09:42
To: London.pm Perl M[ou]ngers
Subject: Re: Perl and IPv6. It's alright now.
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 02:02:59PM +0100, D
on.pm-boun...@london.pm.org
[mailto:london.pm-boun...@london.pm.org] On Behalf Of Jesse Vincent
Sent: 17 April 2011 14:44
To: London.pm Perl M[ou]ngers
Subject: Re: Perl and IPv6. It's alright now.
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 02:02:59PM +0100, Duncan Garland wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
Hi,
I was half-involved in a discussion about IPv6 on Friday. One of my
colleagues had come across something that suggested that IPv6 may become
critical sooner than we thought. As a result our development manager emailed
him a strategy document he had written. It didn't concern me directly so
Hi,
I was half-involved in a discussion about IPv6 on Friday. One of my
colleagues had come across something that suggested that IPv6 may become
critical sooner than we thought. As a result our development manager emailed
him a strategy document he had written. It didn't concern me directly so
Léon Brocard wrote:
What better way to celebrate the Chinese New Year than to have dim
sum? Let's celebrate the year of the tiger at Pearl Liang.
London.pm dim sum is a social event where we meet up every Thursday at
1pm at a different Chinese restaurant, spend about an hour (and about
£10 cash)
Hi,
Most of our server drives our mirrored, so I wasn't really thinking about
the failure of individual drives. I was thinking about a more serious
failure which might take out the whole disk array or server.
The starting point then is "How often will a failure occur if we keep our
kit new (ie th
PPMPackages/10xx/
Also, if you are doing Perl CGI under IIS7 then you may find that IIS7
is a lot more picky about the headers it gets.
Lyle
Duncan Garland wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just upgraded my laptop from XP Pro to Vista Home Edition. I've
> installed ActiveState Perl 5.1
Hi,
I've just upgraded my laptop from XP Pro to Vista Home Edition. I've
installed ActiveState Perl 5.10 on it as I've done with my previous
machines. However, very little seems to install properly.
For example the PPM (Perl Package Manager) list of modules seems very small
when compared to previ
23 matches
Mail list logo
