Re: New Relic

Thanks, interesting stuff. I don't know if the New Relic SDK is going to be free or not, but my intention is to put the Perl modules on CPAN. On 20 December 2013 08:20, Gareth Harper wrote: > On 19 December 2013 22:33, Duncan Garland >wrote: > > > So far all they&#x

New Relic

the issues which are likely to arise? Regards Duncan

Fosdem 2013

Is there going to be a Perl stall or a dev room at the next Fosdem? Duncan

RE: Alternative sources of Perl programmers

Do you want to come out to Thames Ditton? It's a bit of a hike, but if you're interested I'll see what I can do. -Original Message- From: london.pm-boun...@london.pm.org [mailto:london.pm-boun...@london.pm.org] On Behalf Of James Laver Sent: 15 May 2013 23:20 To: London.pm Perl M[ou]ngers

RE: Alternative sources of Perl programmers

When we want a PHP programmer, we only have to whistle. Anyway, that's the background. Thanks for all your replies. A fascinating read. Duncan -Original Message- From: london.pm-boun...@london.pm.org [mailto:london.pm-boun...@london.pm.org] On Behalf Of Mark Stringer Sent: 14 May 2

Re: Alternative sources of Perl programmers

Yes, we were a co-sponsor of the 2012 London Perl Workshop. Sorry for the typo. As far as I know, the last London PM tech meeting was in October 2012. It's great news if they are starting again. On 16 May 2013 09:16, Dave Cross wrote: > Quoting Duncan Garland : > > We spon

RE: Alternative sources of Perl programmers

When we want a PHP programmer, we only have to whistle. Anyway, that's the background. Thanks for all your replies. A fascinating read. Duncan -Original Message- From: london.pm-boun...@london.pm.org [mailto:london.pm-boun...@london.pm.org] On Behalf Of Mark Stringer Sent: 14 May 2

Alternative sources of Perl programmers

m of ours won an industry-wide prize for "Best Digital Initiative" a couple of months ago.) All the best. Duncan

Southampton PM

e. All the best. Duncan

Re: Fosdem Perl-devroom AW1.126, Saturday, Feb 2nd, 11:00-19:00; Success! 14 speakers!

Well done! On 27 January 2013 20:48, Wendy G.A. van Dijk wrote: > Hello all, > > Fosdem. https://fosdem.org/2013/ We made it. We've got 14 speakers > with 14 talks, one for each speaker. We even have 4 lightning talks. The > schedule is craamed with Perly goodness, even without a lunchbrea

RE: We get a dev-room at Fosdem after all. Emergency Call for Papers!

Hi Wendy, It sounds like you're turning this into a good new story. Stop it immediately. We only go in for bad news stories at the moment. Only joking. It all seems under control. Duncan -Original Message- From: london.pm-boun...@london.pm.org [mailto:london.pm-boun...@london.p

RE: We get a dev-room at Fosdem after all. Emergency Call for Papers!

ship. I thought that if TPF put up £5000 immediately then that would solve the problem. Then if commercial sponsors come forward you can return some or all of the money. I've never been to Fosdem, but it looks important. All the best. Duncan -Original Message- From: london.pm-boun

RE: We get a dev-room at Fosdem after all. Emergency Call for Papers!

Hi Leo, No worries. I've seen your presentations on Puppet, DBIx::Class and Plack and always enjoyed them. I know you headed up London PM in 2011 as well. That was a good effort. Duncan -Original Message- From: london.pm-boun...@london.pm.org [mailto:london.pm-boun...@london.p

RE: We get a dev-room at Fosdem after all. Emergency Call for Papers!

ngers Subject: Re: We get a dev-room at Fosdem after all. Emergency Call for Papers! Hi Duncan, Please contact the TPF and let them know how many hours a week you are able to commit to helping co-ordinate this sort of thing. Leo On 26 Jan 2013, at 11:25, Duncan Garland wrote: > Hi, > &

RE: We get a dev-room at Fosdem after all. Emergency Call for Papers!

PWs. The last 5 plus one a couple of years before that. I'm active in both London PM and Southampton PM. Don't patronise me. Duncan -Original Message- From: london.pm-boun...@london.pm.org [mailto:london.pm-boun...@london.pm.org] On Behalf Of Leo Lapworth Sent: 26 January 2013

RE: We get a dev-room at Fosdem after all. Emergency Call for Papers!

sn't listed on https://fosdem.org/2013/schedule/ as having a developer room.) Regards Duncan -Original Message- From: london.pm-boun...@london.pm.org [mailto:london.pm-boun...@london.pm.org] On Behalf Of Wendy G.A. van Dijk Sent: 25 January 2013 20:41 To: london.pm@london.pm.org Subj

LPW 2012 Template::Toolkit Workshop

delay. Duncan

Re: Perl 5 core maintenance fund drive

> Note that 2 days after the announcement of the fund, both Booking.com > and cPanel donated $10,000, which makes for a total of $30,000 (with the > matching $10,000 from Vienna.pm), not counting any individual donations. How did you know that? This fund isn't listed on the Fund Drive Status page:

RE: Perl 5 core maintenance fund drive

a few bug fixes will slip by a release or two? Is this something LPM should be getting behind? Can LPW be used to raise some funds? Duncan -Original Message- From: london.pm-boun...@london.pm.org [mailto:london.pm-boun...@london.pm.org] On Behalf Of Mark Fowler Sent: 30 June 2011 05:06 To: Lon

RE: Perl and IPv6. It's alright now.

Thanks -Original Message- From: london.pm-boun...@london.pm.org [mailto:london.pm-boun...@london.pm.org] On Behalf Of Paul LeoNerd Evans Sent: 26 April 2011 09:42 To: London.pm Perl M[ou]ngers Subject: Re: Perl and IPv6. It's alright now. On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 02:02:59PM +0100, D

RE: Perl and IPv6. It's alright now.

Hi Jesse, Ok, I'll see if I can organise something. Perl 5.13 is a beta release which is due to become the production release 5.14 this year isn't it? Can I conclude that 5.14 is expected to have good quality IPv6 support. Thanks. Duncan -Original Message- From: lond

Perl and IPv6. It's alright now.

mpression that Perl is "harmful". It's clear that this is an exaggeration, but it's not clear whether or not the problem has been solved. Does anybody have a high-level summary of the current situation? Would anybody like to write one? I don't think I'm the right person. I don't know if it's alright now or not. All the best. Duncan

Perl and IPv6. It's alright now.

mpression that Perl is "harmful". It's clear that this is an exaggeration, but it's not clear whether or not the problem has been solved. Does anybody have a high-level summary of the current situation? Would anybody like to write one? I don't think I'm the right person. I don't know if it's alright now or not. All the best. Duncan

Re: London.pm Dim Sum Pearl Liang Thursday 1pm

27;s quite hard to find: be sure to check "Getting here" on the link above. See you there! Leon Hi Leon, Are there any plans for technical meetings? I'm in Watford so I'm a bit far out for the socials but I used to come in for the technical meeetings. All the best. Duncan

RE: Hardware Reliability

t of date by the time they are published. I wonder if the problem can be approached from the other end. I wonder if there is a design standard (ISO or such like) which states that a manufacturer should aim for an MTBF of whatever. I'll let you know if I find anything. Duncan -Origina

RE: ActiveState Perl on Vista

d Vista Home Edition. Thanks for your help. Duncan -Original Message- From: Lyle [mailto:webmas...@cosmicperl.com] Sent: 14 February 2009 21:50 To: duncan.garl...@ntlworld.com Subject: Re: ActiveState Perl on Vista Hi Duncan, I'm in a similar situation. ActiveState have recently overhau

ActiveState Perl on Vista

ope with Vista's eccentricities, or isn't Perl very well supported on Vista Regards Duncan

Re: My New Job (Was: Social Thurs 8 Jan 2009)

On 5-Jan-09, at 4:42 PM, Chisel Wright wrote: On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 08:59:24PM +, David Cantrell wrote: And you know the Circle line's bad when a fat bastard like *me* says that. The Circle Line was one of my reasons for getting a foldy. The Circle Line was one of my reasons for leavi

Re: [OT] Web Hosting on Linux with ssh access

www.oneandone.co.uk are good. Not too sure about how much CPAN they have installed but their tech support has always been good at responding to questions when I've needed to use them Andy Williams wrote: Hi, I'm looking for a hosting company for a website I want to set-up. It'll need the foll

Re: require

out of the code and left the "my" in there - DOH! problem solved and everythings working fine now though. thanks for the examples anyway. duncan

Re: require

... duncan

require

ok, so this is a really basic question, but ive been having problems. i need to include an array thats located in an external file. everytime i try and require it i get no errors but the array isnt found, so the sub routine fails... can anyone show me an example that works? thanks duncan

Re: insidious biometrics, identity crises

and it took about a week and half for the police to eventually identifiy him (as a semi-homeless local alcoholic). duncan

Re: URL wierdness...

The Live HTTP Header plugin for Phoenix/FireBird comes in handy for this sort of debugging: GET / HTTP/1.1 Host: www.acxiom.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021207 Phoenix/0.5 Accept: text/xml,application/xml,application/xhtml+xml,text/html;q=0.9,tex

Re: [REVIEW] Test Driven Development by Example

On Tuesday, January 21, 2003, at 12:19 pm, Dean wrote: Is the Smalltalk Best Practice Patterns general enough that people without smalltalk backgrounds can take something away from it? If so I may end up adding it to my reading list. Absolutely it is. The latter chapters perhaps are more obs

Re: re-animating regexes

On Wednesday, November 27, 2002, at 03:00 pm, Nicholas Clark wrote: I've kept quiet up to now because I remember a thread on p5p from a while back where someone thought it would be possible, but it turned out it never was. IIRC. ie - I don't think that anyone's pulled it off yet. http://searc

Re: re-animating regexes

On Wednesday, November 27, 2002, at 02:44 am, Paul Makepeace wrote: use Disclaimer qw(late_night_post); Is it possible to Storable a qr// ? WTF is a Regexp=SCALAR(0x) anyway, and how could I play with it? Paul, who found nothing enlightening in Storable(3pm), perlref, or RT I've actually n

Re: applying patterns

On Thu, 2002-10-10 at 11:52, Dave Hinton at home wrote: > On Thursday 10 October 2002 11:05am, Shevek wrote: > > On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Marty Pauley wrote: > > > Hashes in Perl have iterators ('each') but they also provide array-based > > > > You're quite right, TIEHASH is a better example than TIEAR

One Year Ago...

Roughly one year ago an event happened that penetrated the mists of time that swirl through my head just a moment ago. This event was the usurping of the Meeting Date, and the initiation of what was to become the New Heretics. I seem to remember (although it 'tis not written in the ancient scro

Re: networks and scalability

ail longer than 160 characters and all that crap. duncan

Re: Money and mouse clicks

dvanced text messages" (ie not having to bash at my mobile phone for ages to only get 160 characters of information). duncan

Re: Money and mouse clicks

-mobile are charging 20 quid per month and give you an allowance of 10 meg of pictures allowed to be sent that month. duncan

look at his name

apologies to anyone if this is you... http://www.novell.com/education/cde/features/randy.html

Re: pipelines

> Oh, I know this. I meant, when you get down to it is OpenFrame a > > while (1) { > ... > sleep ($foo) > } > > loop? Or a prefork or threaded or some strange new beast or ... None. OpenFrame is none! Moohahahhhahahahahaha! Its an exercise left up to the implementor. For example,

MMS [was: Re: The Hotel Fiasco 2 - Please read and respond]

On Thursday, February 14, 2002, at 06:04 PM, Lucy McWilliam wrote: > >> * Greg McCarroll ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >>> people staying at the MMS have a good stay, so I'm going to >> >> I blame NMS for the above, it should of course of been MMA. > > MMS = Michael Marshall Smith. Great author.

Re: london.pm digest, Vol 1 #611 - 24 msgs

On Thursday, February 14, 2002, at 10:27 PM, Mike Jarvis wrote: > On Thu, 2002-02-14 at 17:04, Tim Noll wrote: > >> And, as far as the london.pm meetings go, I'm off to the States for two >> weeks starting tomorrow. But when I return, if I can manage to drag >> some >> of my hapless colleagues

Re: User Input at speed

On Wednesday, February 13, 2002, at 05:36 PM, Ivor Williams wrote: > I am also looking to track down a contrasty PC keyboard - black keys > labelled in white, or white keys labelled in black (as opposed to dark > brown I'd love to track down a translucent labelless keyboard. I can touch type

Re: [ANNOUNCE] OpenFrame 2.05

Randal L. Schwartz wrote: >> "Jonathan" == Jonathan Stowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >Jonathan> On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Leon Brocard wrote: >>> This is the first wide announcement of the release of OpenFrame. >>> > >Jonathan> I tested the previous versions and I can vouch that it passes its t

OpenFrame presentation slides

Are available at: http://openframe.fotango.com/docs/presentation/London_pm-png/ as well as the beginning of the rest of the openframe website. Regards, james.

Re: Towards a refactoring browser

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >And, on closer inspection it gets us a good long way along the road to >a refactoring browser. To the extent that I've taken your original >code sample, added some other stuff which means it can spot the use >of, say $_ and packaged it all up, along with the beginnings o

Re: Football

Consider me in - provided I can be rolling subbed on and off to stop me from dying I'll play :-) --james Richard Clyne wrote: >I'll join in, but I'm not confident of getting enough players. > >Go on, prove me wrong!! >Richard > >> From: "Greg McCarroll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > >> > Ok, i know

Re: pdcawley++

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Is this what you were thinking of? > >No. At least, not until B::Deparse works on 100% of perl code. And of >course, the browser needs to come back to the user and query for the >names of the arguments and of the method, replace the code with a >method call, preferably

Re: pdcawley++

[resent because of my other email address is not subscribed - bah] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Is this what you were thinking of? > >No. At least, not until B::Deparse works on 100% of perl code. And of >course, the browser needs to come back to the user and query for the >names of the arguments

Re: pdcawley++

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >"Dave Cross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I like the idea of a refactoring browser. Why not parse Perl with perl? Is this what you were thinking of? use strict; use warnings; use B::Deparse; my $stringcode; { l