In the lastest installment of IT fuckwittage, I now bring you ...
'Self destructing' emails developed
A US firm has developed software which enables e-mails to
self-destruct after a certain period of time, leaving no trace in
inboxes or servers.
Omniva Policy Systems's electronic equivalent o
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 12:30:14AM +1000, Ian Brayshaw wrote:
> Anyone else thinking "Big Brother" (not the crappy TV show)? ...
No, I'm thinking "binary attachment, return to sender with complaint".
See also: Word Document.
> Is it just me, or are more and more people starting to lose the plot?
* Ian Brayshaw ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> In the lastest installment of IT fuckwittage, I now bring you ...
> Is it just me, or are more and more people starting to lose the plot?
Isn't it great?
Greg
--
Greg McCarroll http://217.34.97.146/~gem/
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 12:30:14AM +1000, Ian Brayshaw wrote:
> In the lastest installment of IT fuckwittage, I now bring you ...
>
> 'Self destructing' emails developed
I remember first seeing this at least 6 months and possibly a year ago.
People haven't learnt anything since the discovery of
> Only a unique key from Omniva's server can encrypt the e-mail and the
> recipient's e-mail program requests the key to decode the message.
> When detonation time is reached, the key becomes void.
How do you void the key? If I've decrypted the mail at some point I
*have* the key (as I am clever
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 03:51:53PM +0100, Mark Fowler wrote:
> How do you void the key? If I've decrypted the mail at some point I
> *have* the key (as I am clever and have hacked my client to save me a copy
> to disk)
...and been locked up under the DMCA.
Alex
--
"Four pints of milk, a turke
On 19/09/01 10:53 -0400, Alex Page wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 03:51:53PM +0100, Mark Fowler wrote:
>
> > How do you void the key? If I've decrypted the mail at some point I
> > *have* the key (as I am clever and have hacked my client to save me a copy
> > to disk)
>
> ...and been locked u
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 04:02:40PM +0100, Simon Batistoni wrote:
> Damned if you do, damned if you don't, according to where you live.
> In the US, you'll be locked up under the DMCA, but over here, thanks
> to the wonders of RIPA, anyone holding an encrypted copy of a
> message who is later unabl
On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Mark Fowler wrote:
> > Only a unique key from Omniva's server can encrypt the e-mail and the
> > recipient's e-mail program requests the key to decode the message.
> > When detonation time is reached, the key becomes void.
>
> How do you void the key? If I've decrypted the m
History fails to record who quoted:
>> > Only a unique key from Omniva's server can encrypt the e-mail and the
>> > recipient's e-mail program requests the key to decode the message.
>> > When detonation time is reached, the key becomes void.
Is anyone going to mention the gloriously mad Interne
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 05:51:34PM +0100, Paul Mison wrote:
> Is anyone going to mention the gloriously mad Internet 2000 proposal
> from everyone's favourite programmer kook djb?
> http://cr.yp.to/im2000.html
You may have, but it's a crazy idea, nonetheless.
> Mind you, looking at it, people st
11 matches
Mail list logo
