Re: *simple* blogging (addon) software

2009-03-03 Thread Peter Corlett
On 25 Feb 2009, at 18:07, Dirk Koopman wrote: It seems I need to have a couple of blogs. Sigh. I am looking for some simple perl blogging software that can be added/interfaced to a lighttpd server. No MySQL/postgres or complex databases allowed, won't allow either on the server. I would ac

Re: *simple* blogging (addon) software

2009-02-26 Thread breno
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Simon Cozens wrote: > A fairly horribly restricted hosting environment *was* specified, > though. Blosxom's the right choice for something like that. > Sorry, I thought the only restriction was no database, so I was focusing more on the "...but would prefer someth

Re: *simple* blogging (addon) software

2009-02-26 Thread jesse
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:26:03PM +, Tomas Doran wrote: > > If one was to be a pedant, it could be argued that Angerwhale is > likely to be more simple (in code directly comprising it) as it does > less (most of the heavy lifting being done by CPAN). > > But I'm not a pedant, so I wou

Re: *simple* blogging (addon) software

2009-02-26 Thread Simon Cozens
Tomas Doran wrote: > I guess it depends which axis of simple you were concerned about. With > the pedant hat still on, I'd go on to argue that the definition of > 'simple' wasn't well enough specified in the original post. A fairly horribly restricted hosting environment *was* specified, though. B

Re: *simple* blogging (addon) software

2009-02-26 Thread Tomas Doran
On 26 Feb 2009, at 21:35, Simon Cozens wrote: breno wrote: I've never used it, but Angerwhale *might* suit your needs: http://search.cpan.org/perldoc?Angerwhale CPAN Deps tells me that Angerwhale requires 221 additional modules. Bryar requires 45. Blosxom requires zero. What was that word

Re: *simple* blogging (addon) software

2009-02-26 Thread Simon Cozens
breno wrote: > I've never used it, but Angerwhale *might* suit your needs: > > http://search.cpan.org/perldoc?Angerwhale CPAN Deps tells me that Angerwhale requires 221 additional modules. Bryar requires 45. Blosxom requires zero. What was that word again? "*simple*", was it? S

Re: *simple* blogging (addon) software

2009-02-26 Thread breno
I've never used it, but Angerwhale *might* suit your needs: http://search.cpan.org/perldoc?Angerwhale Cheers, -b On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Bob Walker wrote: > On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Simon Cozens wrote: > >> Dirk Koopman wrote: >>> >>> No MySQL/postgres or complex databases allowed, won't

Re: *simple* blogging (addon) software

2009-02-25 Thread Bob Walker
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Simon Cozens wrote: Dirk Koopman wrote: No MySQL/postgres or complex databases allowed, won't allow either on the server. I would accept (a tad reluctantly) SQLite3, but would prefer something that is directory/file based. Two good choices are Blosxom and Bryar, then. i

Re: *simple* blogging (addon) software

2009-02-25 Thread Simon Cozens
Dirk Koopman wrote: > No MySQL/postgres or complex databases allowed, won't allow either on > the server. I would accept (a tad reluctantly) SQLite3, but would prefer > something that is directory/file based. Two good choices are Blosxom and Bryar, then. -- Complete the following sentence: Peopl

Re: *simple* blogging (addon) software

2009-02-25 Thread Spiros Denaxas
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Dirk Koopman wrote: > It seems I need to have a couple of blogs. Sigh. I am looking for some > simple perl blogging software that can be added/interfaced to a lighttpd > server. > > No MySQL/postgres or complex databases allowed, won't allow either on the > server.

*simple* blogging (addon) software

2009-02-25 Thread Dirk Koopman
It seems I need to have a couple of blogs. Sigh. I am looking for some simple perl blogging software that can be added/interfaced to a lighttpd server. No MySQL/postgres or complex databases allowed, won't allow either on the server. I would accept (a tad reluctantly) SQLite3, but would prefer