On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 8:11 AM, Jonathan Stowe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Sat, 2008-10-18 at 14:27 +0100, Martin A. Brooks wrote:
Jonathan Stowe wrote:
Anyone know a good way of stopping joe-jobbed spam which doesn't
involve
spf and stuff ?
Don't have a catchall.
That
On 20 Oct 2008, at 10:24, Jonathan Stowe wrote:
Well looking at the original message more carefully, unless Tielman is
actually the spammer himself, then there does appear to be a way of
causing gmail to send messages as a third party to everyone in that
third party's contact list.
Indeed,
2008/10/20 Paul Makepeace [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 8:11 AM, Jonathan Stowe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Sat, 2008-10-18 at 14:27 +0100, Martin A. Brooks wrote:
Jonathan Stowe wrote:
Anyone know a good way of stopping joe-jobbed spam which doesn't
involve
spf and stuff
2008/10/20 Jonathan Stowe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well looking at the original message more carefully, unless Tielman is
actually the spammer himself, then there does appear to be a way of
causing gmail to send messages as a third party to everyone in that
third party's contact list.
I was
On Sat, 2008-10-18 at 14:27 +0100, Martin A. Brooks wrote:
Jonathan Stowe wrote:
Anyone know a good way of stopping joe-jobbed spam which doesn't involve
spf and stuff ?
Don't have a catchall.
That doesn't solve the particular problem here. You lot don't see most
of the spam that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Corlett wrote:
On 18 Oct 2008, at 13:56, Oliver Gorwits wrote:
Except SPF is itself broken; so the problem remains.
I'm sure we shall be all delighted to hear your much better suggestion
which solves it.
True, I should have mentioned...
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 08:11:12AM +0100, Jonathan Stowe wrote:
On Sat, 2008-10-18 at 14:27 +0100, Martin A. Brooks wrote:
Jonathan Stowe wrote:
Anyone know a good way of stopping joe-jobbed spam which doesn't involve
spf and stuff ?
Don't have a catchall.
That doesn't solve the
On 19 Oct 2008, at 23:29, David Cantrell wrote:
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 08:11:12AM +0100, Jonathan Stowe wrote:
On Sat, 2008-10-18 at 14:27 +0100, Martin A. Brooks wrote:
Jonathan Stowe wrote:
Anyone know a good way of stopping joe-jobbed spam which doesn't
involve
spf and stuff ?
Don't
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 11:29 PM, David Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
someone who was subscribed to the list thus goes straight through.
Apparently this kind of thing can be caused by a potential XSS
vulnerability in gmail so might become more common.
So we just unsub everyone using
On 18 Oct 2008, at 13:56, Oliver Gorwits wrote:
[...]
Except SPF is itself broken; so the problem remains.
I'm sure we shall be all delighted to hear your much better suggestion
which solves it.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Radoslaw Zielinski wrote:
Jonathan Stowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [17-10-2008 19:46]:
Anyone know a good way of stopping joe-jobbed spam which doesn't involve
spf and stuff ?
There is none. That's why spf and stuff have been invented.
Except SPF is
On Saturday 18 Oct 2008, Martin A. Brooks wrote:
Jonathan Stowe wrote:
Anyone know a good way of stopping joe-jobbed spam which doesn't involve
spf and stuff ?
Don't have a catchall.
or use one of those slightly annoying systems that the sender is requested to
visit a web form to validate
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 08:16:46PM +0100, MacGyveR wrote:
or use one of those slightly annoying systems that the sender is requested to
visit a web form to validate themselves before the mail gets delivered to
you.
Ah yes those. I like those. I remember one that mailed me about a message I
On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 03:07 +0800, Tielman de Villiers wrote:
Dear friend,
i would like to introduce a good company who trades mainly in
electornic products.
Now the company is under sales promotion,all the products are sold
nearly at its cost
They provide the best service to customers
Jonathan Stowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [17-10-2008 19:46]:
On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 03:07 +0800, Tielman de Villiers wrote:
Dear friend,
[...]
Anyone know a good way of stopping joe-jobbed spam which doesn't involve
spf and stuff ?
There is none. That's why spf and stuff have been invented
2008/10/17 Jonathan Stowe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 03:07 +0800, Tielman de Villiers wrote:
Dear friend,
Anyone know a good way of stopping joe-jobbed spam which doesn't involve
spf and stuff ?
Cattle prods ? Tazers ?
No, really, don't do that again.
--
No train here
Dear friend,
i would like to introduce a good company who trades mainly in
electornic products.
Now the company is under sales promotion,all the products are sold
nearly at its cost.
They provide the best service to customers,they provide you with
original products of
good quality,and what
17 matches
Mail list logo