On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 07:27:42AM -0400, Chris Devers wrote:
> That fits the profile I saw. Have you tried bouncing it to Spamcop.net?
> Set up a Spamcop account & they'll track down the headers, find all the
> ISPs, and allow you to send a complaint to all the relevant abuse@...
> addresses. I'm
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> I've had 3 as "cheap fags" and 1 as "Discount cigarettes". 3 to the same
> address, 1 to a mailing list I'm on. They are all from a machine with a
> HELO of linux.local in a netblock that whois says is bt.es IIRC
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't exist, and [
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 10:05:57PM +0100, Earle Martin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 05:45:12PM -0400, Chris Devers wrote:
> > > Anyone else received one of these ?
> >
> > Variations of it, yeah -- ${rand}@smoking.com.cn sent me
> > two or three mails in the past few days, to this address.
>
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 05:45:12PM -0400, Chris Devers wrote:
> > Anyone else received one of these ?
>
> Variations of it, yeah -- ${rand}@smoking.com.cn sent me
> two or three mails in the past few days, to this address.
I just got one to my (void) address.
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, the hatter wrote:
> Anyone else received one of these ?
Variations of it, yeah -- ${rand}@smoking.com.cn sent me
two or three mails in the past few days, to this address.
All my favorite things -- tobacco, foreign spam, etc.
They sure researched their demographics... :/
-
Anyone else received one of these ? Strangely enough, I don't use
london.pm@bang for much else, I suspect they've been reaping addresses
from elsewhere. It's the first spam I've had to my london.pm address.
the hatter
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 05:52:30 +0200
