Re: [CFT] Now available for interview

2003-01-22 Thread Piers Cawley
Dave Hodgkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 20:09, Piers Cawley wrote: >> Toby|Wintrmute <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 09:04:31AM +, Nigel Wetters wrote: >> >> Weren't we all meant to be millionaires on stock options by now? >> > >> > ROFL

Re: [CFT] Now available for interview

2003-01-22 Thread Dave Hodgkinson
On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 20:09, Piers Cawley wrote: > Toby|Wintrmute <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 09:04:31AM +, Nigel Wetters wrote: > >> Weren't we all meant to be millionaires on stock options by now? > > > > ROFL > > > > If anyone wants Pracom stocks, I think I've

Re: [CFT] Now available for interview

2003-01-21 Thread Piers Cawley
Toby|Wintrmute <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 09:04:31AM +, Nigel Wetters wrote: >> Weren't we all meant to be millionaires on stock options by now? > > ROFL > > If anyone wants Pracom stocks, I think I've got them in spades - it's > probably cheaper than buying toilet

Re: [CFT] Now available for interview

2003-01-21 Thread Toby|Wintrmute
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 09:04:31AM +, Nigel Wetters wrote: > Weren't we all meant to be millionaires on stock options by now? ROFL If anyone wants Pracom stocks, I think I've got them in spades - it's probably cheaper than buying toilet paper. (Well, would be, if the stocks were printed..)

Re: Now available for interview

2003-01-21 Thread Roger Burton West
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 01:00:53PM +, Shevek wrote: >On 21 Jan 2003, Dave Hodgkinson wrote: >> Oh, and please refrain from using [CFT] in the subject - that's what the >> *real* CFT mailing list uses :-) >Surely this is a task for a proper hierarchical namespace? [london.pm], >[london.pm/cft],

Re: Now available for interview

2003-01-21 Thread Shevek
On 21 Jan 2003, Dave Hodgkinson wrote: > On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 09:04, Nigel Wetters wrote: > > It looks like my firm is going to be making redundancies, and I've been > > told that I'm going to be among the departees. > > Oh, and please refrain from using [CFT] in the subject - that's what the >

Re: Now available for interview

2003-01-21 Thread Dave Hodgkinson
On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 09:04, Nigel Wetters wrote: > It looks like my firm is going to be making redundancies, and I've been > told that I'm going to be among the departees. Oh, and please refrain from using [CFT] in the subject - that's what the *real* CFT mailing list uses :-) -- Dave Hodgkinso

Re: [CFT] Now available for interview

2003-01-21 Thread Dave Hodgkinson
On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 09:04, Nigel Wetters wrote: > Weren't we all meant to be millionaires on stock options by now? Ever heard of the 95% club? -- Dave Hodgkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[CFT] Now available for interview

2003-01-21 Thread Nigel Wetters
It looks like my firm is going to be making redundancies, and I've been told that I'm going to be among the departees. I've not been too lucky in choosing employers so far, having worked for two failed dot-coms and ITV Digital, but maybe I'll be luckier this time. Please drop me a note <[EMAIL PR