On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 10:24:03AM +, Lusercop wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 10:20:17AM +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
It is probably just me, but I hate to see a computer not used to its
full potential and penderel is sitting unloaded for much of the day.
You could do what I do with
* David Cantrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
In the grand scheme of things, penderel isn't actually that important. It's
nice to have, and I'm grateful to those who look after it, but I won't lose
any sleep over failures. So it runs our web site and the mailing list.
Ok, splitting off
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 10:20:17AM +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
It is probably just me, but I hate to see a computer not used to its
full potential and penderel is sitting unloaded for much of the day.
You could do what I do with the unused CPU time on colon, and donate it
to one Nicholas Clark
At 18/11/2002 10:20 [], Greg McCarroll wrote:
I think Penderel is one of london.pm's most underused assets. Its got
a reasonable processor (AMD-K6/350), 1/2gig of memory and 25gig of
free disk, which by my standards makes it a useful little machine. We
probably can't use too much bandwidth on it,
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Greg McCarroll wrote:
It is probably just me, but I hate to see a computer not used to its
full potential and penderel is sitting unloaded for much of the day.
Personally, I think that this is the wrong way to look at this. I prefer
instead to think that we have the extra
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 10:20:17AM +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
I think Penderel is one of london.pm's most underused assets. Its got
a reasonable processor (AMD-K6/350), 1/2gig of memory and 25gig of
One of the more recent possible, and certainly very real older
reasons it is/was unused is
* Paul Makepeace ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 10:20:17AM +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
I think Penderel is one of london.pm's most underused assets. Its got
a reasonable processor (AMD-K6/350), 1/2gig of memory and 25gig of
One of the more recent possible, and
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 01:51:44PM +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
* Paul Makepeace ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 10:20:17AM +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
I think Penderel is one of london.pm's most underused assets. Its got
a reasonable processor (AMD-K6/350), 1/2gig of
Penderel is stable now, since putting in bits donated kindly by (oops,
can't remember, sorry, kind person).
There's a pending hardware upgrade too, which I paid for in advance of
receiving suggested 20 quid donation for some extra accounts (5 quid for
the unwaged/otherwise poor). I'll drop in
* alex ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
An installation of subversion would be a very good thing, which was
mentioned on IRC earlier.
Well I'd like to see someone take ownership of this task, which may
provide the foundation of a project i'd like to see happen.
The project is stolen almost
10 matches
Mail list logo
