Re: Perl and IPv6. It's alright now.

2011-04-28 Thread Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
On the non-socket front, I've successfully used NetAddr::IP for building and checking whitelists for IPv4 and IPv6 connections.

RE: Perl and IPv6. It's alright now.

2011-04-28 Thread Duncan Garland
Thanks -Original Message- From: london.pm-boun...@london.pm.org [mailto:london.pm-boun...@london.pm.org] On Behalf Of Paul LeoNerd Evans Sent: 26 April 2011 09:42 To: London.pm Perl M[ou]ngers Subject: Re: Perl and IPv6. It's alright now. On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 02:02:59PM +0100, D

Re: Perl and IPv6. It's alright now.

2011-04-26 Thread Richard Foley
> Once 5.14.0 is out, I'm hoping to suggest placing IO::Socket::IP in core > too, alongside the older ::INET. > That sounds like a *very* good idea. Ciao Richard -- Richard Foley Ciao - shorter than AufWiederSehen! http://www.rfi.net/books.html > On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 02:02:59PM +0100, Dunca

Re: Perl and IPv6. It's alright now.

2011-04-26 Thread Paul LeoNerd Evans
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 02:02:59PM +0100, Duncan Garland wrote: > What's the situation now? Anybody doing a high-level search on the subject > is going to get the impression that Perl is "harmful". It's clear that this > is an exaggeration, but it's not clear whether or not the problem has been > s

Re: Perl and IPv6. It's alright now.

2011-04-18 Thread Dirk Koopman
On 18/04/11 03:16, Jesse Vincent wrote: On Sun 17.Apr'11 at 20:11:09 +0100, Duncan Garland wrote: Hi Jesse, Ok, I'll see if I can organise something. Perl 5.13 is a beta release which is due to become the production release 5.14 this year isn't it? Yes. Can I conclude that 5.14 is expe

Re: Perl and IPv6. It's alright now.

2011-04-17 Thread Jesse Vincent
On Sun 17.Apr'11 at 20:11:09 +0100, Duncan Garland wrote: > Hi Jesse, > > Ok, I'll see if I can organise something. > > Perl 5.13 is a beta release which is due to become the production release > 5.14 this year isn't it? Yes. > Can I conclude that 5.14 is expected to have good > quality IP

RE: Perl and IPv6. It's alright now.

2011-04-17 Thread Duncan Garland
on.pm-boun...@london.pm.org [mailto:london.pm-boun...@london.pm.org] On Behalf Of Jesse Vincent Sent: 17 April 2011 14:44 To: London.pm Perl M[ou]ngers Subject: Re: Perl and IPv6. It's alright now. On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 02:02:59PM +0100, Duncan Garland wrote: > Hi, > > >

Perl and IPv6. It's alright now.

2011-04-17 Thread Duncan Garland
Hi, I was half-involved in a discussion about IPv6 on Friday. One of my colleagues had come across something that suggested that IPv6 may become critical sooner than we thought. As a result our development manager emailed him a strategy document he had written. It didn't concern me directly so

Re: Perl and IPv6. It's alright now.

2011-04-17 Thread Jesse Vincent
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 02:02:59PM +0100, Duncan Garland wrote: > Hi, > > > > I was half-involved in a discussion about IPv6 on Friday. [...] > I think some wheels were turning in the background. In the middle of last > year one of the people who had been highlighting the problems, Steffan

Perl and IPv6. It's alright now.

2011-04-17 Thread Duncan Garland
Hi, I was half-involved in a discussion about IPv6 on Friday. One of my colleagues had come across something that suggested that IPv6 may become critical sooner than we thought. As a result our development manager emailed him a strategy document he had written. It didn't concern me directly so