Joel Bernstein wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 05:08:39PM +0100, Rhys Hopkins wrote:
Whilst Data Munging with Perl is, of course, a fine book, in
With a fine title.
Following the recent discussion on the pronunciation of
regex / regexp, this is something that has intrigued me for some time,
mung
From: Andy Williams \(IMAP HILLWAY\) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 8/4/03 1:16:52 PM
Hi,
I need to parse an HTML file [0] and pull out all the form
elements and put them into a data structure. What I can't
seem to do is when I have found a select tag is then
parse the associated option tags!
Andy Williams (IMAP HILLWAY) wrote:
I need to parse an HTML file [0] and pull out all the form elements and
put them into a data structure. What I can't seem to do is when I have
found a select tag is then parse the associated option tags!
When you see the start select, you set a flag to say
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Andy Williams (IMAP HILLWAY) wrote:
I need to parse an HTML file [0] and pull out all the form elements and
put them into a data structure. What I can't seem to do is when I have
found a select tag is then parse the associated option tags!
Try HTML::PullParser. The
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Cross
Sent: 04 August 2003 14:34
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: HTML::Parser
Well firstly, you're using the very old (and nasty)
HTML::Parser syntax. It all got a lot nicer (and easier
I need to parse an HTML file [0] and pull out all the form elements
and put them into a data structure. What I can't seem to do is when I
have found a select tag is then parse the associated option tags!
If you're getting valid xhtml:
use XML::Sablotron::DOM;
my $situa = new
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Cross
Sent: 04 August 2003 14:34
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: HTML::Parser
And secondly, if you're trying to build a tree based on the
HTML elements, then you might be far better off
From: Andy Williams \(IMAP HILLWAY\) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 8/4/03 2:49:12 PM
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Cross
Sent: 04 August 2003 14:34
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: HTML::Parser
And secondly, if you're trying
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Cross
Sent: 04 August 2003 16:06
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: HTML::Parser
Whilst Data Munging with Perl is, of course, a fine book,
in this case you'll be better off with Sean
Whilst Data Munging with Perl is, of course, a fine book, in
With a fine title.
Following the recent discussion on the pronunciation of
regex / regexp, this is something that has intrigued me for some time,
mung - ing as in mung beans, or
munj - ing as in sponge ?
Put another way do you mung,
Put another way do you mung, or munge the data ?
Ah, at last a question I care about.
It is of course mung.*
N
* For all values of mung where mung is mung**
** Oh, thats pronounced mung by the way***
*** Oh, okay, as in munge[0][1]
[0] Hmm, different footnote syntax than I normally use.
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 05:08:39PM +0100, Rhys Hopkins wrote:
Whilst Data Munging with Perl is, of course, a fine book, in
With a fine title.
Following the recent discussion on the pronunciation of
regex / regexp, this is something that has intrigued me for some time,
mung - ing as
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Rhys Hopkins wrote:
Following the recent discussion on the pronunciation of
regex / regexp, this is something that has intrigued me for some time,
mung - ing as in mung beans, or
munj - ing as in sponge ?
Put another way do you mung, or munge the data ?
Surely from
Rhys Hopkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] quoth:
*
*Put another way do you mung, or munge the data ?
mung is a fun word in American English :)
The dictionary of american regional english defines it as
mang or mung
1. 1884 Amer. Philol. Accos. Trans. for 1183 14.51 WV, Man means in West.
Virginia the
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 05:08:39PM +0100, Rhys Hopkins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Whilst Data Munging with Perl is, of course, a fine book, in
With a fine title.
Following the recent discussion on the pronunciation of
regex / regexp, this is something that has intrigued me for some
15 matches
Mail list logo
