On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 04:28:50PM +, Simon Wistow wrote:
> I suppose I could upgrade the Perl on my colo to 5.6.1 but I'm not sure
> if I could be arsed.
All other things being equal, I'd suggest upgrading it to 5.8.0,
given that 5.8.x is actively being maintained, and 5.8.0 isn't slow
if you
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 04:23:24PM +, Mark Fowler said:
> I actually got bit by this last month, as Mr Cantrell had started more
> than one thread with the subject "books" and pine's very immature
> threading couldn't cope.
Perhaps one could modify the algorithm so that if the mails were, say,
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Simon Wistow wrote:
> His 5th step is "If any two members of the root set have the same
> subject, merge them. This is so that messages which don't have
> References headers at all still get threaded (to the extent possible, at
> least.)"
I actually got bit by this last month
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 04:06:26PM +, robin szemeti said:
> most MUA's use the 'References:' or the 'In-reply-to:' line in the header to
> do the threading ... off hand I can't think of any that use the subject line
/me coughs and points at
http://www.jwz.org/doc/threading.html
which list
