Re: SPOILERS : Re: Interesting Numbers

2001-10-20 Thread Dave Cross
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 10:09:27PM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Greg McCarroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > *wibble* > > Grep, get a life! ITYM "get a _job_" :) Dave... -- .sig missing...

Re: SPOILERS : Re: Interesting Numbers

2001-10-19 Thread Greg McCarroll
* Dave Hodgkinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Greg McCarroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > *wibble* > > Grep, get a life! > Dave, trust me that isn't that sad, what would be sad is if i had already started writing a quiz for next friday and dreamt some of the questions, and was say for exa

Re: SPOILERS : Re: Interesting Numbers

2001-10-19 Thread Dave Hodgkinson
Greg McCarroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: *wibble* Grep, get a life! -- David Hodgkinson, Wizard for Hirehttp://www.davehodgkinson.com Editor-in-chief, The Highway Star http://www.deep-purple.com All the Purple Family Tree news http://www.slashrock.com Int

Re: Interesting Numbers

2001-10-19 Thread David H. Adler
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 04:30:51PM +0200, Newton, Philip wrote: > Greg McCarroll wrote: > > >212 > > Clue: Mark Fowler should know this one > > It's a NYC area code. It was, for many years, *the* nyc area code. dha -- David H. Adler - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.panix.com/~dha/

Re: Interesting Numbers

2001-10-19 Thread Greg McCarroll
* Chris Devers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >1 , 9 , 36 , 84 , 126 > >3 , 7 , 31 , 127 > > I can't find these ones! I can't cheat! :) > I did these ones myself ;-) > Not in the book! Yes it is. Read the clue again carefully and think about it. Greg -- Greg McCarroll

Re: Interesting Numbers

2001-10-19 Thread Chris Devers
On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote: > I remembered one of my favourite books, "The Penguin Dictionary of > Curious and Interesting Numbers". Good book :) > So hear we go (some are easy, some are pretty much impossible).. > >4840 Clue: page 158. Is it Robin Szmetia, esq

Re: SPOILERS : Re: Interesting Numbers

2001-10-19 Thread Newton, Philip
Greg McCarroll wrote: > * Peter Haworth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Fri, 19 Oct 2001 09:48:51 +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote: > > >4840 > > > Clue: Robin Szmeti I think will have the best chance. > > > > For some reason, this sounds like a tape drive to me > > > > >3 , 7 ,

Re: Interesting Numbers

2001-10-19 Thread Newton, Philip
Greg McCarroll wrote: >1 , 9 , 36 , 84 , 126 > Clue: Don't use C to work this out Ah! Got the joke. (Well, after peeking in the EIS.) Actually, C *does* have something to do with those numbers. >212 > Clue: Mark Fowler should know this one It's a NYC area code. Cheers, Ph

Re: Interesting Numbers

2001-10-19 Thread Newton, Philip
Peter Haworth wrote: > On Fri, 19 Oct 2001 09:48:51 +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote: > >3 , 7 , 31 , 127 > > Clue: They are in sequence > > 2**p - 1, where p is prime aka "Mersenne numbers". (A subset of those numbers is the "Mersenne primes".) Apparently, they're important in factoring

Re: Interesting Numbers

2001-10-19 Thread Greg McCarroll
To summarise the answers we have so far . * Greg McCarroll ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >4840 > Clue: Robin Szmeti I think will have the best chance. >1 , 9 , 36 , 84 , 126 > Clue: Don't use C to work this out >3 , 7 , 31 , 127 > Clue: They ar

SPOILERS: Re: Interesting Numbers

2001-10-19 Thread Greg McCarroll
Dave's 84 is the correct answer for this riddle. * Dave Cross ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > From: David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 10/19/01 12:31:29 PM > > >On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 09:48:51AM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote: > >> And finally a quick riddle, where you have to work out >

SPOILERS : Re: Interesting Numbers

2001-10-19 Thread Greg McCarroll
* Peter Haworth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Fri, 19 Oct 2001 09:48:51 +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote: > >4840 > > Clue: Robin Szmeti I think will have the best chance. > > For some reason, this sounds like a tape drive to me > > >3 , 7 , 31 , 127 > > Clue: They a

Re: Interesting Numbers

2001-10-19 Thread David Cantrell
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 05:55:22AM -0700, Dave Cross wrote: > I believe your error was in the calculation of 4 x 504 :) Oh yeah. Oops. Look! It's the Goodyear blimp! [runs away] -- David Cantrell | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david This is a signature. There are many

RE: Interesting Numbers

2001-10-19 Thread Wilson, Andrew (Belfast)
> Assuming the latter ... > >x/6 + x/12 + x/7 + 5 + y + 4 = x # son's life is y >y = (x/6 + x/12 + x/7 + 5 + y)/2 Actually y = (x - 4) / 2 is easier to work with. cheers Andrew

Re: Interesting Numbers

2001-10-19 Thread Dave Cross
From: David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 10/19/01 12:31:29 PM >On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 09:48:51AM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote: >> And finally a quick riddle, where you have to work out >> the age of Diophantus, >> "Here lies Diophantus," the wonder behold . . . >> Through art algebrai

RE: Interesting Numbers

2001-10-19 Thread Richard Clyne
But Diophantus studied equations that are solvable in integers only. I reckon that that is a clue to the desired solution. Richard

Re: Interesting Numbers

2001-10-19 Thread Peter Haworth
On Fri, 19 Oct 2001 09:48:51 +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote: >4840 > Clue: Robin Szmeti I think will have the best chance. For some reason, this sounds like a tape drive to me >3 , 7 , 31 , 127 > Clue: They are in sequence 2**p - 1, where p is prime --

Re: Interesting Numbers

2001-10-19 Thread David Cantrell
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 09:48:51AM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote: > And finally a quick riddle, where you have to work out the age of > Diophantus, > "Here lies Diophantus," the wonder behold . . . > Through art algebraic, the stone tells how old: > "God gave him his boyhood one-

RE: Interesting Numbers

2001-10-19 Thread Dave Cross
From: Greg McCarroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 10/19/01 9:48:51 AM > And finally a quick riddle, where you have to work out > the age of Diophantus, > > "Here lies Diophantus," the wonder behold . . . > Through art algebraic, the stone tells how old: > "God gave him his boyhood one-sixth of