Re: irrelevant questions for candidates

2002-11-18 Thread the hatter
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, David Cantrell wrote: > In the grand scheme of things, penderel isn't actually that important. As my only way of communicating with London.pm as a entity, I'd rather disagree with that. Maybe people who use irc lots, and the list very little, disagree. If penedrel goes down

Re: irrelevant questions for candidates

2002-11-18 Thread David Cantrell
Simon Batistoni wrote: > > If they're irrelevant I'll save time and space by not bothering to answer. > I don't feel that these questions, or the addenda provided by MBM are > in the least bit irrelevant, and I would tend towards reading alex's > title as unnecessarily self-depracating. > > As a

Re: irrelevant questions for candidates

2002-11-17 Thread Mark Fowler
The questions asked were: > > [a] What, in your eyes, is the worst thing that london.pm has ever done? > (i) why? > > [b] What, if anything, would you have done to stop them from carrying > > out this heinous act, if you were leader? > [d] What is the best thing that london.pm has don

Re: irrelevant questions for candidates

2002-11-17 Thread Simon Batistoni
On 17/11/02 23:21 +, David Cantrell wrote: > If they're irrelevant I'll save time and space by not bothering to answer. > I don't feel that these questions, or the addenda provided by MBM are in the least bit irrelevant, and I would tend towards reading alex's title as unnecessarily self-depra

Re: irrelevant questions for candidates

2002-11-17 Thread alex
I am a (very tired) stupid fool. Whoops, a thousand apologies lusercop, I thought you were answering the questions, when you were merely asking good questions. Sorry...

Re: irrelevant questions for candidates

2002-11-17 Thread alex
On Sun, 2002-11-17 at 23:21, David Cantrell wrote: > If they're irrelevant I'll save time and space by not bothering to answer. I sneaked in one relevant one: [c] What are your leaderly plans for penderel (the computer)?

Re: irrelevant questions for candidates

2002-11-17 Thread alex
On Sun, 2002-11-17 at 23:13, Lusercop wrote: > My £0.02 I wasn't actually interested in what non-candidates had to say - best not clutter up the election q&as any more than necessary imho. alex

Re: irrelevant questions for candidates

2002-11-17 Thread David Cantrell
If they're irrelevant I'll save time and space by not bothering to answer. -- David Cantrell|Reprobate|http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david Gehyrst þu, sælida, hwæt þis folc segeð? Hi willað eow to gafole garas syllan, ættrynne ord and ealde swurd, þa heregeatu

Re: irrelevant questions for candidates

2002-11-17 Thread Lusercop
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 10:57:00PM +, alex wrote: > [a] What, in your eyes, is the worst thing that london.pm has ever done? (i) why? > [b] What, if anything, would you have done to stop them from carrying > out this heinous act, if you were leader? > [c] What are your leaderly plans