Re: Time to read (was Re: volume)

2001-09-17 Thread Paul Johnson
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 07:40:43PM +0100, Jonathan Stowe wrote: I mean its probable that most of us are subscribed to multiple medium volume mailing lists like this one ( though I must admit that even I balked at perl-beginners :) and sometimes I wonder how people who dont have the luxury

Re: Time to read (was Re: volume)

2001-09-17 Thread Greg McCarroll
* Jonathan Stowe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I wonder how people who dont have the luxury of a long commute with a laptop cope , how else do you find the time ? There should be enough clues in the headers of this reply to answer your question Mr Stowe, if not please ask for additional

Time to read (was Re: volume)

2001-09-17 Thread Jonathan Stowe
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm off for a while. I need a break for huge mail volumes. IS THIS LOUD ENOUGH FOR YOU DEAR! I think what people really need is a long commute with a laptop everyday ;-} I mean its probable that most of us are subscribed to multiple medium volume