Re: IGNORE: Re: currval in a transaction

2002-07-17 Thread Rafiq Ismail (ADMIN)
Hmmm. On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, Rob Partington wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "Rafiq Ismail (ADMIN)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > 'tis resolved. > > was pussy footing over trying it. > > Jeopardy quoting is evil. You're not related to MBM, are you? * SIG WITHHELD * > But not as evil

Re: IGNORE: Re: currval in a transaction

2002-07-16 Thread Rob Partington
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Rafiq Ismail (ADMIN)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 'tis resolved. > was pussy footing over trying it. Jeopardy quoting is evil. > >"We're so wonderfully wonderfully wonderfully > Wonderfully

IGNORE: Re: currval in a transaction

2002-07-16 Thread Rafiq Ismail (ADMIN)
'tis resolved. was pussy footing over trying it. "We're so wonderfully wonderfully wonderfully Wonderfully pretty Oh you know that I'd do anything for you We should have each other to tea, huh? We sho

currval in a transaction

2002-07-16 Thread Rafiq Ismail (ADMIN)
Does anyone know whether, whilst using postgres, if a an insert followed by a select currval on the index of the last insert, will give a "not yet defined in this session" error on the select, when both statements are a part of the same transaction? *Deep breath* Cheers, Fiq ===