I run a secondary MX for an ex-colleague's domain, in exchange for him doing
the same for me. I have noticed recently that particular messages get stuck
in my queue for him, despite his server being up. Judging from the sender
addresses, they're spam.
Question is - is it polite for him to
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, David Cantrell wrote:
I run a secondary MX for an ex-colleague's domain, in exchange for him doing
the same for me. I have noticed recently that particular messages get stuck
in my queue for him, despite his server being up. Judging from the sender
addresses, they're
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 09:27:34AM +, Jason Clifford wrote:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, David Cantrell wrote:
especially as he sends a 450, which is SO wrong, as I damned well know that
the destination address exists.
It's not the recipient address his server is bitching about but rather the
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, David Cantrell wrote:
especially as he sends a 450, which is SO wrong, as I damned well know that
the destination address exists.
It's not the recipient address his server is bitching about but rather the
sender address.
According to RFC 821, a 450 status means