I hate our internal templating language which we affectionateluy refer
to as "Satan's own templating language" or "Gah, you
suckle on the wang of a syphillitic mule you pus filled buboe of a
abomination-stroke-language ... a curse on your creators may they rot
in hell with their flesh
Simon Wistow said:
> I hate our internal templating language which we affectionateluy refer
> to as "Satan's own templating language" or "Gah, you
> suckle on the wang of a syphillitic mule you pus filled buboe of a
> abomination-stroke-language ... a curse on your creators may they rot
>
On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Simon Wistow said:
>
> > I hate our internal templating language which we affectionateluy refer
> > to as "Satan's own templating language" or "Gah, you
> > suckle on the wang of a syphillitic mule you pus filled buboe of a
> > abomination-stroke-l
Simon Wistow wrote:
> I hate our internal templating language
So why are you still using it?
> But it does have one slightly nice...
Nice? You jest sir!
>
> ...
>
The 0th rule of anything even remotely related to programming computers
is this.
Rule 0: Don't Repeat Yourself
This rule i
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 03:11:03PM +, Andy said:
> So why are you still using it?
Legacy reasons. We are moving to another templating language.
> Nice? You jest sir!
As I said - *given the constraints of the language mentioned* it's
actually very useful.
> The 0th rule of anything e
Simon Wistow wrote:
Ok, so I agree, it's completely effing crackfuelled. I was just bored.
*adds to big list of pointless things that attract other people to go
'oh, what's that?' when bored*
ti'
On Sunday, July 6, 2003, at 09:03 AM, Simon Wistow wrote:
I hate our internal templating language which we affectionateluy refer
to as "Satan's own templating language" or "Gah, you
suckle on the wang of a syphillitic mule you pus filled buboe of a
abomination-stroke-language ... a curse
