* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 06:15:54PM -, Andrew Bowman wrote:
> > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > I reckon it ought to be fairly easy to identify a web server based
> > > on error messages and details of responses.
> > > Is there any software out t
On 3 Dec 2001, Steve Mynott wrote:
> Obvious things are is the response 200 or 404 for requests for
> default.htm or index.html?
We're going in circles here, but if it's up to me, I like to tell Apache
to map all .htm files to .html, and in the case of home pages I redirect
requests for default.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I'm thinking of more or less the same functionality as (iirc) queso,
> which will guess a machine's OS from looking at responses to various
> interesting network packets.
There are only a few web servers in common use (Apache, IIS and
iPlanet (formerly Netscape) and Z
On Mon, 3 Dec 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm thinking of more or less the same functionality as (iirc) queso,
> which will guess a machine's OS from looking at responses to various
> interesting network packets.
I'd think that, even if they change/remove the Server: header that the
other in
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I reckon it ought to be fairly easy to identify a web server based
> on error messages and details of responses.
>
> Is there any software out there that already does this, or evidence
> as to why it would be impractical?
Depends what you're trying to achieve - is ther
On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, David Cantrell wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 04:38:04PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I reckon it ought to be fairly easy to identify a web server based
> > on error messages and details of responses.
> >
> > Is there any software out there that already does this, or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sent the following bits through the ether:
> That doesn't actually *say*, but it sounds like it just uses the
> Server: header to work out what web server you're running.
It does. I never got around to releasing the module when I was working
there.
Anyway, I was *convinced* th
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 04:38:04PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I reckon it ought to be fairly easy to identify a web server based
> on error messages and details of responses.
>
> Is there any software out there that already does this, or evidence
> as to why it would be impractical?
It's
On Mon, 3 Dec 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I reckon it ought to be fairly easy to identify a web server based
> on error messages and details of responses.
But that sort of thing can be munged. Can you query $ENV{server_software}?
Even if you could, that can me munged too.
> Is there any s
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 04:38:04PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I reckon it ought to be fairly easy to identify a web server based
> on error messages and details of responses.
It is. That, and it usually tells you.
> Is there any software out there that already does this, or evidence
> as
10 matches
Mail list logo
