Re: Recommendation for simple Web Frameworks

2011-01-10 Thread Eden Cardim
Simon == Simon Wistow si...@thegestalt.org writes: Simon In short - I don't really need the CRUD stuff from a Simon framework, I really just need the url based dispatch. I Simon played around with Catalyst (which I'm familiar with from 6A) Simon but it felt like it was a bit of a

Re: Recommendation for simple logger on Windows?

2011-01-10 Thread Richard Huxton
On 07/01/11 18:34, Alex Kalderimis wrote: I've enjoyed Log::Handler - nicely customisable. Perhaps this doesn't address the issue of overkill, but the minimal use cases have sensible defaults. Thanks for the tip. -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd

IT Crowd Reynholm Industries website referencing Perl

2011-01-10 Thread Kaoru
Hey, Reynolm Industries has announced they are hiring! http://www.reynholm.co.uk/employment.php The website is pretty funny if you know the show well and catch all the in-jokes. If you get deep enough you might find this... http://www.reynholm.co.uk/~moss/files/ Which contains PERL Win32

Re: IT Crowd Reynholm Industries website referencing Perl

2011-01-10 Thread Jacqui Caren-home
On 10/01/2011 11:54, Kaoru wrote: Hey, Reynolm Industries has announced they are hiring! http://www.reynholm.co.uk/employment.php The website is pretty funny if you know the show well and catch all the in-jokes. If you get deep enough you might find this...

Re: IT Crowd Reynholm Industries website referencing Perl

2011-01-10 Thread Dave Cross
On 01/10/2011 12:39 PM, Jacqui Caren-home wrote: On 10/01/2011 11:54, Kaoru wrote: Hey, Reynolm Industries has announced they are hiring! http://www.reynholm.co.uk/employment.php The website is pretty funny if you know the show well and catch all the in-jokes. If you get deep enough you

Re: Recommendation for simple Web Frameworks

2011-01-10 Thread Matt Sergeant
Eden Cardim wrote: Simon == Simon Wistowsi...@thegestalt.org writes: Simon In short - I don't really need the CRUD stuff from a Simon framework, I really just need the url based dispatch. I Simon played around with Catalyst (which I'm familiar with from 6A) Simon but

Re: Recommendation for simple Web Frameworks

2011-01-10 Thread Eden Cardim
Matt == Matt Sergeant mserge...@messagelabs.com writes: Matt But the dependencies list *is* much larger for Catalyst. That's hardly the topic at hand. -- Eden Cardim Software Engineer Shadowcat Systems Ltd. http://www.shadowcat.co.uk http://blog.edencardim.com

Re: Recommendation for simple Web Frameworks

2011-01-10 Thread David Precious
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 18:42 -0200, Eden Cardim wrote: Matt == Matt Sergeant mserge...@messagelabs.com writes: Matt But the dependencies list *is* much larger for Catalyst. That's hardly the topic at hand. When the OP is looking for simple frameworks, it's a valid thing to take into

Re: Recommendation for simple Web Frameworks

2011-01-10 Thread Simon Wistow
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 08:25:37AM -0200, Eden Cardim said: Simon == Simon Wistow si...@thegestalt.org writes: You got the wrong impression, Catalyst isn't tied to anything, it's just a plugglable/configurable http dispatcher, it's as simple as any of the other perl web frameworks in that

Re: Recommendation for simple Web Frameworks

2011-01-10 Thread John Imison
On 10/01/2011 9:13 PM, David Precious wrote: On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 18:42 -0200, Eden Cardim wrote: Matt == Matt Sergeantmserge...@messagelabs.com writes: Matt But the dependencies list *is* much larger for Catalyst. That's hardly the topic at hand. When the OP is looking for simple

Re: Recommendation for simple Web Frameworks

2011-01-10 Thread Dave Hodgkinson
On 10 Jan 2011, at 20:42, Eden Cardim wrote: Matt == Matt Sergeant mserge...@messagelabs.com writes: Matt But the dependencies list *is* much larger for Catalyst. That's hardly the topic at hand. Of course it is. Are all the prereqs at the required level out there in the latest RHEL

Re: Recommendation for simple Web Frameworks

2011-01-10 Thread Dave Hodgkinson
On 10 Jan 2011, at 22:00, John Imison wrote: On 10/01/2011 9:13 PM, David Precious wrote: On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 18:42 -0200, Eden Cardim wrote: Matt == Matt Sergeantmserge...@messagelabs.com writes: Matt But the dependencies list *is* much larger for Catalyst. That's hardly the

Re: Recommendation for simple Web Frameworks

2011-01-10 Thread Peter Edwards
Matt == Matt Sergeant mserge...@messagelabs.com writes: Matt But the dependencies list *is* much larger for Catalyst. Indeed. I'm in a corporate environment where installing 70+ up to date CPAN modules is a non-trivial requirement. I needed to update our Twitter feeder recently and

Re: Recommendation for simple Web Frameworks

2011-01-10 Thread Dave Hodgkinson
On 10 Jan 2011, at 22:41, Peter Edwards wrote: Matt == Matt Sergeant mserge...@messagelabs.com writes: Matt But the dependencies list *is* much larger for Catalyst. Indeed. I'm in a corporate environment where installing 70+ up to date CPAN modules is a non-trivial requirement. I

Re: Recommendation for simple Web Frameworks

2011-01-10 Thread Denny
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 22:00 +, John Imison wrote: Out of interest, does anyone use CGI::Application? What are the general thoughts on that? It's called Titanium now isn't it? Seemed nice and simple when I last used it. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Recommendation for simple Web Frameworks

2011-01-10 Thread Jesse Vincent
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:55:42PM +, Dave Hodgkinson wrote: On 10 Jan 2011, at 22:41, Peter Edwards wrote: Matt == Matt Sergeant mserge...@messagelabs.com writes: Matt But the dependencies list *is* much larger for Catalyst. Indeed. I'm in a corporate environment

Re: Recommendation for simple Web Frameworks

2011-01-10 Thread Peter Edwards
On 10 January 2011 22:59, Denny 2...@denny.me wrote: On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 22:00 +, John Imison wrote: Out of interest, does anyone use CGI::Application? What are the general thoughts on that? It's called Titanium now isn't it? Seemed nice and simple when I last used it. I'm

Re: Recommendation for simple Web Frameworks

2011-01-10 Thread Dave Hodgkinson
On 10 Jan 2011, at 23:01, Jesse Vincent wrote: On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:55:42PM +, Dave Hodgkinson wrote: On 10 Jan 2011, at 22:41, Peter Edwards wrote: Matt == Matt Sergeant mserge...@messagelabs.com writes: Matt But the dependencies list *is* much larger for Catalyst.

Re: IT Crowd Reynholm Industries website referencing Perl

2011-01-10 Thread Katie T
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Kaoru ka...@slackwise.net wrote: Which contains PERL Win32 Quick Reference and Util.pdf which is the POD of Apache::Util :) Yay Perl. We did a (non-scientific) survey[1] that found about 12% of The IT Crowd fanbase was made up of developers maybe we should