Re: GNU ar vs SUS

2001-04-06 Thread Theodore Tso
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 02:36:39PM -0400, Stuart Anderson wrote: > On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Dale Scheetz wrote: > > > Is q==r just another "difference" to be listed along with N? > > Hi Dale! > Yes, I think it is just another difference to document. I don't think we actually need to document th

Re: Latest list of undocumented commands

2001-04-06 Thread Theodore Tso
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 11:07:13AM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote: > With awk the problem is which set of options are likely to exist on any > given system. Debian provides gawk, but the "standard system" comes with > mawk instead because it's smaller, so gawk may not be there. Without any > investigat

Re: GNU ar vs SUS

2001-04-06 Thread Stuart Anderson
On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Dale Scheetz wrote: > This is at least proof that the -q otpion is not implimented as -r. It > doesn't answer the question of whether the index is updated by -q. > > Should I make anything of this in the spec? Hmmm... If we are using the SUS document as the base, then we don'

Re: GNU ar vs SUS

2001-04-06 Thread Dale Scheetz
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Stuart Anderson wrote: > On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Dale Scheetz wrote: > > > Is q==r just another "difference" to be listed along with N? > > Hi Dale! > Yes, I think it is just another difference to document. > Thanks Stuart! This will help with other options like -l, but I