Re: [Lsr] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-04: (with COMMENT)

2018-12-20 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 04:42:13AM +, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) wrote: > Benjamin - > > Inline. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Benjamin Kaduk > > Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2018 7:35 PM > > To: The IESG > > Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810...@ietf.org; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)

[Lsr] Protocol Action: 'IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-05.txt)

2018-12-20 Thread The IESG
The IESG has approved the following document: - 'IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions' (draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-05.txt) as Proposed Standard This document is the product of the Link State Routing Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Alvaro Retana, Martin Vigoureux and

Re: [Lsr] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-04: (with COMMENT)

2018-12-20 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Done. V5 has been published. Les From: Alvaro Retana Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2018 7:46 AM To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Acee Lindem (acee) ; Suresh Krishnan Cc: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) ; draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810...@ietf.org; The IESG ; lsr@ietf.org; lsr-cha...@ietf.org Subject:

[Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-05.txt

2018-12-20 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF. Title : IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions Authors : Les Ginsberg Stefano

Re: [Lsr] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-04: (with COMMENT)

2018-12-20 Thread Alvaro Retana
On December 20, 2018 at 10:43:06 AM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ( ginsb...@cisco.com) wrote: I think the document is better off as is – but if you folks insist I will remove the text – though clearly I disagree with this choice. Please do. Thanks! Alvaro. __

Re: [Lsr] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-04: (with COMMENT)

2018-12-20 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Folks – Here is the relevant paragraph from the Appendix - some emphasis added. “As a means of interoperating with implementations which do not conform to the corrections defined in this document, implementers may wish to consider temporarily supporting sending and/or receiving the form

Re: [Lsr] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-04: (with COMMENT)

2018-12-20 Thread Eric Rescorla
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 6:42 AM Alvaro Retana wrote: > On December 20, 2018 at 9:03:18 AM, Eric Rescorla (e...@rtfm.com) wrote: > > Hi! > > Looking at S 14, I see the following "The following people contributed > substantially to the content of this > document and should be considered co-authors"

Re: [Lsr] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-04: (with COMMENT)

2018-12-20 Thread Alvaro Retana
On December 20, 2018 at 9:03:18 AM, Eric Rescorla (e...@rtfm.com) wrote: Hi! Looking at S 14, I see the following "The following people contributed substantially to the content of this document and should be considered co-authors". Is this just an artifact of the 5 author limit? Perhaps we should

[Lsr] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-04: (with COMMENT)

2018-12-20 Thread Eric Rescorla
Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-04: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer

Re: [Lsr] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-04: (with COMMENT)

2018-12-20 Thread Warren Kumari
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 6:54 AM Alvaro Retana wrote: > On December 19, 2018 at 6:09:55 PM, Warren Kumari (war...@kumari.net) > wrote: > > Warren: > > Hi! > > 1: From the shepherd writeup: > (7) Has each author confirmed that any and all appropriate IPR > disclosures required for full conformance

Re: [Lsr] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-04: (with COMMENT)

2018-12-20 Thread Warren Kumari
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 11:17 PM Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) wrote: > (Copying Mirja as well since one portion of my reply relates to her > comment) > > Warren - > > Inline. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Warren Kumari > > Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2018 3:10 PM > > To: The IESG > >

Re: [Lsr] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2018-12-20 Thread Peter Psenak
Hi Benjamin, are you ok with my responses and proposed changed text for the range? thanks, Peter On 17/12/2018 12:32 , Peter Psenak wrote: Hi Benjamin, please see inline (##PP): On 17/12/2018 06:53 , Benjamin Kaduk wrote: Sorry for the slow reply -- you caught me right as I was leaving for

Re: [Lsr] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-04: (with COMMENT)

2018-12-20 Thread Alvaro Retana
On December 20, 2018 at 5:38:51 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) (a...@cisco.com) wrote: We only know of one implementation that has the wrong encoding and we have fixed that one. I then see no harm in removing the “generosity” paragraph. As Suresh suggests, it will make the document even clearer. Thanks

Re: [Lsr] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-04: (with COMMENT)

2018-12-20 Thread Alvaro Retana
On December 19, 2018 at 6:09:55 PM, Warren Kumari (war...@kumari.net) wrote: Warren: Hi! 1: From the shepherd writeup: (7) Has each author confirmed that any and all appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 have already been filed. If not

Re: [Lsr] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-04: (with COMMENT)

2018-12-20 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Hi Suresh, On 12/20/18, 12:44 AM, "Suresh Krishnan" wrote: Hi Les, Thanks for the quick response. Comments inline. > On Dec 19, 2018, at 11:36 PM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) wrote: > > Suresh - > > Inline. > >> -Original Message- >> From: