Hi all,
We’ve posted a new draft today for your consideration.
This was “Area Abstraction”. We’re renaming it to “Area Proxy”. The intent is
the same.
We’ve thrown away all need for tunneling. To do this, we’ve raised the
requirement that the area be level-1-2. This seems simpler.
We’ve ad
Hi Dhruv,
On 03/10/2019 16:48, Peter Psenak wrote:
(3) Section 3, Add reference to draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label for the
definition and usage of ERLD
##PP
The Introduction section has:
"This capability, referred to as Entropy Readable Label Depth (ERLD) as
defined in[I-D.ietf-mpls-spr
Hi Dhruv,
On 03/10/2019 16:14, Dhruv Dhody wrote:
Hi Peter,
Snipping to open points...
(1) Please use updated requirement language text as per RFC 8174, as you do
have a mix of upper-case and lower-case terms in your I-D.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL
Hi Peter,
Snipping to open points...
> > (1) Please use updated requirement language text as per RFC 8174, as you do
> > have a mix of upper-case and lower-case terms in your I-D.
> >
> >The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL
> >NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT",
Hi Dhruv,
please see inline (##PP)
On 12/09/2019 12:11, Dhruv Dhody via Datatracker wrote:
Reviewer: Dhruv Dhody
Review result: Has Issues
Subject: RtgDir Early review: draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-09
Hello
I have been selected to do a routing directorate “early” review of this draft.
https:/